Computation, chaos and non-deterministic symbolic computation: The chinese room problem solved?
Psycoloquy 12 (50) (2001)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Selmer Bringsjord (1998). Cognition is Not Computation: The Argument From Irreversibility. Synthese 113 (2):285-320.
Kazuyuki Aihara & Jun Kyung Ryeu (2001). Chaotic Neurons and Analog Computation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):810-811.
Ajit Narayanan (1991). The Chinese Room Argument. In Logical Foundations. New York: St Martin's Press.
Paolo Cotogno (2003). Hypercomputation and the Physical Church-Turing Thesis. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (2):181-223.
Nir Fresco (forthcoming). Explaining Computation Without Semantics: Keeping It Simple. Minds and Machines.
Arnon Avron & Beata Konikowska (2009). Proof Systems for Reasoning About Computation Errors. Studia Logica 91 (2):273 - 293.
Ricardo Restrepo (2012). Computers, Persons, and the Chinese Room. Part 1: The Human Computer. Journal of Mind and Behavior 33 (1):27-48.
Itay Shani (2005). Computation and Intentionality: A Recipe for Epistemic Impasse. Minds and Machines 15 (2):207-228.
Robert W. Kentridge (1995). Symbols, Neurons, Soap-Bubbles and the Neural Computation Underlying Cognition. Minds and Machines 4 (4):439-449.
Roger Penrose (2003). Consciousness, Computation, and the Chinese Room. In John M. Preston & Michael A. Bishop (eds.), Views Into the Chinese Room: New Essays on Searle and Artificial Intelligence. Oxford University Press.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads22 ( #56,171 of 549,065 )Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #10,311 of 549,065 )How can I increase my downloads? |

