International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13 (4):477 – 488 (2005)
|Abstract||Heidegger distinguishes between concern for things and solicitude for other Dasein. As Dasein is already being-in-the-world and being-with from the start, there is no need to define what another Dasein is to recognize it. In this paper it is argued that Dasein is thrown into circles of care, where the distinction between solicitude and concern is given. Although this undermines any attempts to regard a comatose patient as non-Dasein, it raises questions about Dasein's relations with animals. It is suggested that Dasein's relations with animals could be captured by inserting another circle, for which the German word versorgen might be suitable.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Mariana Ortega (2000). Dasein Comes After the Episternic Subject, But Who Is Dasein? International Philosophical Quarterly 40 (1):51-67.
Mariana Ortega (2005). When Conscience Calls, Will Dasein Answer? Heideggerian Authenticity and the Possibility of Ethical Life. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13 (1):15 – 34.
Piotr Hoffman (2000). Heidegger and the Problem of Idealism. Inquiry 43 (4):403 – 411.
Kevin Aho (2007). Gender and Time: Revisiting the Question of Dasein's Neutrality. Epoché 12 (1):137-155.
Marcia Sá Cavalcante Schuback (2005). Die Gabe und Aufgabe des Währenden. Studia Phaenomenologica 5:201-214.
Quentin Smith (forthcoming). Reply to Vallicella: Heidegger and Idealism. International Philosophical Quarterly.
John Russon (2008). The Self as Resolution: Heidegger, Derrida and the Intimacy of the Question of the Meaning of Being. Research in Phenomenology 38 (1):90-110.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #122,297 of 722,700 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,006 of 722,700 )
How can I increase my downloads?