Confidentiality: the confusion continues

Journal of Medical Ethics 8 (1):9-11 (1982)
Abstract
The author, a regional health authority administrator, argues that `ownership' is a side issue in legal and moral arguments over confidentiality of medical records. Nor is it practicable, he argues, for doctors alone to control all access to the medical records. He proposes the principle of `custodianship' of confidential information, to be accepted by an institution as a whole, as a possible way of resolving the problem. In commentaries on this and the following article an academic lawyer and a practising physician respond
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 12,088
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Ke Yu (2008). Confidentiality Revisited. Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (2):161-172.
M. A. Crook (2013). The Risks of Absolute Medical Confidentiality. Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):107-122.
Katherine J. Morris (1995). Intermingling and Confusion. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 3 (2):290 – 306.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-09-13

Total downloads

4 ( #267,800 of 1,101,955 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #306,569 of 1,101,955 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.