Language, philosophy and the risk of failure: Rereading the debate between Searle and Derrida [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Continental Philosophy Review 35 (2):117-133 (2002)
In this paper I return to one of the central points of contention in the renowned debate between John Searle and Jacques Derrida with the aim of rethinking the role of success and the place of failure in communication. What is the philosophical significance of Austin's decision to exclude from his investigation (in How to Do Things with Words) certain utterances that cannot qualify as successful? Examining the conflicting ways in which Searle and Derrida understand and respond to Austin, I try to flesh out Derrida's call to grant failure (or the negative) the important place it deserves in our understanding of speech. Yet, whereas for Derrida, the call to recognize failure as an internal and positive condition ultimately leads to a structural – albeit a deconstructive – critique of language's conditions of possibility, I focus instead on the implications which this insight may have for our understanding of the actuality of language. Consequently, I argue that while Derrida's critique subverts the hegemony of success, it ironically remains, like Searle, distant from and external to the actual reverberation of spoken language.
|Keywords||Philosophy Phenomenology Philosophy of Man Political Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Todd S. Mei (2014). Are Reasons Enough? Sen and Ricoeur on the Idea of Impartiality. Dialogue 53 (2):243-270.
Similar books and articles
Françoise Dastur (2006). Derrida and the Question of Presence. Research in Phenomenology 36 (1):45-62.
Nam-In Lee (2010). Phenomenology of Language Beyond the Deconstructive Philosophy of Language. Continental Philosophy Review 42 (4):465-481.
Joan Leach (1994). Taking Sides: Science, Language, and Debate After Derrida, Searle, and Alan Gross. Social Epistemology 8 (4):361 – 372.
Alan G. Gross (1994). Is a Science of Language Possible? The Derrida-Searle Debate. Social Epistemology 8 (4):345 – 359.
J. Hillis Miller (2009). For Derrida. Fordham University Press.
Dieter Freundlieb (1990). Hermeneutics, Deconstruction, and Linguistic Theory. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 21 (1):183-203.
Stanley Raffel (2011). Understanding Each Other: The Case of the Derrida-Searle Debate. Human Studies 34 (3):277-292.
Kas Saghafi (2010). Apparitions--Of Derrida's Other. Fordham University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads28 ( #109,526 of 1,725,584 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #167,283 of 1,725,584 )
How can I increase my downloads?