Graduate studies at Western
Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71 (3):256 – 269 (1993)
|Abstract||My aim in this paper is, by process of elimination, to elucidate and defend an account of how ordinary people act on their values. I will be making both a descriptive claim about our psychology and a further claim about its effectiveness and rational status. I want to suggest that the way in which most of us in fact put our values into practice is, over time, preferable to the ways which initially seem required or at least desirable.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Bart Geurts & Emar Maier (2005). Quotation in Context. In Philippe de Brabanter (ed.), Hybrid Quotations. John Benjamins.
Frank A. Lewis (2009). Parmenides' Modal Fallacy. Phronesis 54 (1):1-8.
Konstantin Kolenda (1964). Unconscious Motives and Human Action. Inquiry 7 (1-4):1 – 12.
Terence Cuneo (2011). A Puzzle Regarding Reid's Theory of Motives. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (5):963-981.
Herman Cappelen & Ernie Lepore (2003). Varieties of Quotation Revisited. Belgian Journal of Linguistics (17):51-75.
Michelle Ciurria (2012). A New Mixed View of Virtue Ethics, Based on Daniel Doviak's New Virtue Calculus. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (2):259-269.
Vincent Di Norcia & Joyce Tigner Larkins (2000). Mixed Motives and Ethical Decisions in Business. Journal of Business Ethics 25 (1):1-13.
Vincent Di Norcia & Joyce Tigner (2000). Mixed Motives and Ethical Decisions in Business. Journal of Business Ethics 25 (1):1 - 13.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #65,500 of 740,451 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,960 of 740,451 )
How can I increase my downloads?