David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cambridge University Press (2002)
At the core of Kant's ethics lies the claim that if there is a supreme principle of morality then it cannot be a principle based on utilitarianism or Aristotelian perfectionism or the Ten Commandments. The only viable candidate for such a principle is the categorical imperative. This book is the most detailed investigation of this claim. It constructs a new, criterial reading of Kant's derivation of one version of the categorical imperative: the Formula of Universal Law. This reading shows this derivation to be far more compelling than contemporary philosophers tend to believe. It also reveals a novel approach to deriving another version of the categorical imperative, the Formula of Humanity, a principle widely considered to be the most attractive Kantian candidate for the supreme principle of morality. This book will be important not just for Kant scholars but for a broad swathe of students of philosophy.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$24.97 new (78% off) $29.95 used (73% off) $104.49 direct from Amazon (6% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||B2799.E8.K45 2002|
|ISBN(s)||0521810892 9780521810890 0521810892|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Patricia Kitcher (2004). Kant's Argument for the Categorical Imperative. Noûs 38 (4):555-584.
Michael Moehler (2012). A Hobbesian Derivation of the Principle of Universalization. Philosophical Studies 158 (1):83-107.
Jill Hernandez (2010). Impermissibility and Kantian Moral Worth. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (4):403 - 419.
George Pavlakos (2008). Non-Individualism, Rights, and Practical Reason. Ratio Juris 21 (1):66-93.
Similar books and articles
Jane Kneller (2003). Review: Kerstein, Kant's Search for the Supreme Principle of Morality (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (4):564-565.
Thomas M. Besch (2008). Constructing Practical Reason: O'Neill on the Grounds of Kantian Constructivism. Journal of Value Inquiry 42 (1):55-76.
T. E. Hill (2004). Kant's Search for the Supreme Principle of Morality. Philosophical Review 113 (2):272-275.
Kenneth R. Westphal (1995). How "Full" is Kant's Categorical Imperative? Jahrbuch für Recht Und Ethik/Annual Review of Law and Ethics 3:465-509.
Gideon Rosen (2009). Might Kantian Contractualism Be the Supreme Principle of Morality? Ratio 22 (1):78-97.
Andrews Reath (2010). Contemporary Kantian Ethics. In John Skorupski (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Ethics. Routledge
Douglas Lind (1994). Kant on Criminal Punishment. Journal of Philosophical Research 19:61-74.
Allen W. Wood (2006). The Supreme Principle of Morality. In Paul Guyer (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy. Cambridge University Press 342--80.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads29 ( #94,044 of 1,699,648 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #269,935 of 1,699,648 )
How can I increase my downloads?