Risk and Responsibility: A Complex and Evolving Relationship

Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (1):91-102 (2012)
This paper analyses the nature of the relationship between risk and responsibility. Since neither the concept of risk nor the concept of responsibility has an unequivocal definition, it is obvious that there is no single interpretation of their relationship. After introducing the different meanings of responsibility used in this paper, we analyse four conceptions of risk. This allows us to make their link with responsibility explicit and to determine if a shift in the connection between risk and responsibility can be outlined. (1) In the engineer’s paradigm, the quantitative conception of risk does not include any concept of responsibility. Their relationship is indirect, the locus of responsibility being risk management. (2) In Mary Douglas’ cultural theory, risks are constructed through the responsibilities they engage. (3) Rayner and (4) Wolff go further by integrating forms of responsibility in the definition of risk itself. Analysis of these four frameworks shows that the concepts of risk and responsibility are increasingly intertwined. This tendency is reinforced by increasing public awareness and a call for the integration of a moral dimension in risk management. Therefore, we suggest that a form of virtue-responsibility should also be integrated in the concept of risk.
Keywords Risk  Responsibility  Models of risk  Cultural theory  Virtue
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-010-9246-y
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,316
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Sven Ove Hansson (2004). Philosophical Perspectives on Risk. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 8 (1):10-35.
Steve Rayner (1992). Cultural Theory and Risk Analysis. In S. Krimsky & D. Golding (eds.), Social Theories of Risk. Praeger 83--115.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
John Kadvany (1997). Varieties of Risk Representations. Journal of Social Philosophy 28 (3):123-143.
Stale Fredriksen (2005). Luck, Risk, and Blame. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (5):535 – 553.
Suzanne M. Uniacke (2005). Responsibility and Obligation: Some Kantian Directions. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13 (4):461 – 475.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

32 ( #148,418 of 1,932,585 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #333,232 of 1,932,585 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.