David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy in the Contemporary World 8 (1):41-46 (2001)
George Schedler raises interesting issues with regard to the amount of reparations owed for slavery, the parties who are owed reparations, and the standard for these reparations. His arguments, however, do not hold up upon analysis. His analysis of the case for the descendants of slaves being owed compensation seriously overestimates the case for such reparations. He does not identify the grounds for such compensation, i.e., either stolen inheritance or the descendants’ trustee-like control over the slave’s estate, and this results in his not identifying the metaphysical and epistemic problems that accompany the descendants’ claim to reparations. In analyzing whether the U.S. government owes compensation, Schedler provides arguments based on its small role in bringing about slavery and the break in national identity that followed the Civil War. Such arguments fail but his conclusion can be supported by other arguments, specifically the nature of the federal government’s relation to slavery and the limited nature of its powers. Thus, the case against reparations is overwhelming but not for the reasons Schedler provides
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Thomas McCarthy (2004). Coming to Terms with Our Past, Part II: On the Morality and Politics of Reparations for Slavery. Political Theory 32 (6):750-772.
Chris Buck (2004). Sartre, Fanon, and the Case for Slavery Reparations. Sartre Studies International 10 (2):123-138.
Howard Mcgary (2010). Reconciliation and Reparations. Metaphilosophy 41 (4):546-562.
Jon Miller & Rahul Kumar (eds.) (2007). Reparations: Interdisciplinary Inquiries. Oxford University Press.
Lawrie Balfour (2005). Reparations After Identity Politics. Political Theory 33 (6):786 - 811.
George Schedler (2003). Should the Federal Government Pay Reparations for Slavery? Social Theory and Practice 29 (4):567-588.
Derrick Darby (2010). Reparations and Racial Inequality. Philosophy Compass 5 (1):55-66.
Thom Brooks (2008). A Two-Tiered Reparations Theory: A Reply to Wenar. Journal of Social Philosophy 39 (4):666-669.
Howard McGary (2003). Achieving Democratic Equality: Forgiveness, Reconciliation, and Reparations. [REVIEW] Journal of Ethics 7 (1):93-113.
Pablo De Greiff (ed.) (2006). The Handbook of Reparations. Oxford University Press.
George Schedlerf (2002). Principles for Measuring the Damages of American Slavery. Public Affairs Quarterly, 16 (4):377-404.
Ernesto Verdeja (2006). Reparations in Democratic Transitions. Res Publica 12 (2):115-136.
NaomiZack Zack (2003). Reparations and the Rectification of Race. Journal of Ethics 7 (1):139-151.
Jonathan Kaplan & Andrew Valls (2007). Housing Discrimination As a Basis for Black Reparations. Public Affairs Quarterly 21 (3):255-274.
Added to index2012-03-18
Total downloads8 ( #168,430 of 1,098,823 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #43,265 of 1,098,823 )
How can I increase my downloads?