|Abstract||Lucas and Redhead () announce that they will defend the views of Redhead () against the argument by Panu Raatikainen (). They certainly re-state the main claims of Redhead (), but they do not give any real arguments in their favour, and do not provide anything that would save Redhead’s argument from the serious problems pointed out in (Raatikainen ). Instead, Lucas and Redhead make a number of seemingly irrelevant points, perhaps indicating a failure to understand the logico-mathematical points at issue|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Panu Raatikainen (2000). The Concept of Truth in a Finite Universe. Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (6):617-633.
Sami Pihlström, Panu Raatikainen & Matti Sintonen (eds.) (2007). Approaching Truth: Essays in Honour of Ilkka Niiniluoto. College Publications.
Robert Weingard (1984). Grand Unified Gauge Theories and the Number of Elementary Particles. Philosophy of Science 51 (1):150-155.
Panu Raatikainen (2008). Truth, Meaning, and Translation. In Douglas Patterson (ed.), New essays on Tarski and philosophy. O.U.P..
M. Redhead (2004). Mathematics and the Mind. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (4):731-737.
Charles Sayward (1990). Four Views of Arithmetical Truth. Philosophical Quarterly 40 (159):155-168.
Donald Gillies (1986). In Defense of the Popper-Miller Argument. Philosophy of Science 53 (1):110-113.
Panu Raatikainen (2005). Truth and Provability: A Comment on Redhead. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (3):611-613.
John R. Lucas & Michael Redhead (2007). Truth and Provability. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (2):331-2.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads125 ( #3,844 of 549,010 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #7,681 of 549,010 )
How can I increase my downloads?