David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Mind 119 (474):423-436 (2010)
Cieslinski has given an interesting response to Shapiro 1998 and Ketland 1999, which argued that deflationary truth theories are inadequate, since they lack the property of ‘reflective adequacy’. Cieslinski’s response, following Tennant (2002, 2005), aims to explain, without a detour using truth axioms, why someone who accepts the axioms of a theory should also accept its reflection principles. The argument is formulated very clearly (in fact, to justify a different reflection principle), and involves a couple of important assumptions, the crucial one being that the reflection scheme for a theory ‘expresses’ the acceptance of its theorems. I argue that this assumption is incorrect. For if the reflection principle for a theory expresses the claim that one is ready to accept its theorems, this latter claim should imply the reflection principle. But it does not. So, I conclude, the response fails to yield the required ‘truth-free’ method for proving or justifying reflection principles
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Jody Azzouni (1999). Comments on Shapiro. Journal of Philosophy 96 (10):541-544.
Timothy Bays (2009). Beth's Theorem and Deflationism. Mind 118 (472):1061-1073.
Keith DeRose (2010). The Conditionals of Deliberation. Mind 119 (473):1 - 42.
Solomon Feferman (1991). Reflecting on Incompleteness. Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (1):1-49.
Solomon Feferman & Thomas Strahm (2000). The Unfolding of Non-Finitist Arithmetic. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 104 (1-3):75-96.
Citations of this work BETA
Bradley Armour-Garb (2012). Challenges to Deflationary Theories of Truth. Philosophy Compass 7 (4):256-266.
Similar books and articles
Jeffrey Ketland (2009). Beth's Theorem and Deflationism — Reply to Bays. Mind 118 (472):1075-1079.
Michael Glanzberg (2005). Truth, Reflection, and Hierarchies. Synthese 142 (3):289 - 315.
Cezary Cieśliński (2010). Deflationary Truth and Pathologies. Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (3):325 - 337.
Volker Halbach, Axiomatic Theories of Truth. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Jeffrey Ketland (1999). Deflationism and Tarski's Paradise. Mind 108 (429):69-94.
Volker Halbach (2001). Disquotational Truth and Analyticity. Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (4):1959-1973.
Cezary Cieśliński (2007). Deflationism, Conservativeness and Maximality. Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (6):695 - 705.
N. Tennant (2010). Deflationism and the Godel Phenomena: Reply to Cieslinski. Mind 119 (474):437-450.
Cezary Cieśliński (2010). Truth, Conservativeness, and Provability. Mind 119 (474):409-422.
Added to index2010-08-11
Total downloads9 ( #159,722 of 1,102,882 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #120,639 of 1,102,882 )
How can I increase my downloads?