David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Heythrop Journal 51 (6):1035-1052 (2010)
It is commonly held that Karl Barth emphatically rejected the usefulness of philosophy for theology. In this essay I explore the implications of Barth's theological epistemology for the relationship and proper boundaries between philosophy and theology, given its origin in Barth's theology of revelation. I seek to clarify Barth's position with respect to philosophy by distinguishing the contingency of its offence from any necessary incompatibility. Barth does not reject philosophy per se, but the way in which philosophy is typically conducted. This is made explicit through an analysis of Barth's censure of the uncritical acceptance in theology of modernist philosophical presuppositions. I nuance Barth's response to a collection of philosophical assumptions that are rarely distinguished in theological literature. Finally, I highlight a representative instance of Barth's reflections on philosophy in relationship to theology, to demonstrate that the criterion for evaluating the usefulness of philosophical assumptions and methods in the service of theology is the same criterion by which theology is itself evaluated
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Brent Hege, Liberal Theology in the Weimar Era: Schleiermacher and the Question of Religious Subjectivity in the Methodenstreit Between Georg Wobbermin and Karl Barth.
J. B. Webster (1998). Barth's Moral Theology: Human Action in Barth's Thought. W.B. Eerdmans Pub..
Oliver O'Donovan (1991). Karl Barth and Ramsey's "Uses of Power". Journal of Religious Ethics 19 (2):1 - 30.
Daniel L. Migliore (ed.) (2010). Commanding Grace: Studies in Karl Barth's Ethics. W.B. Eerdmans Pub. Co..
Darren O. Sumner (2011). Common Actualization: Karl Barth's Recovery and Reappropriation of the Communication of Natures. Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 53 (4):465-479.
Paul Brazier (2009). Barth, Israel and Jesus (Barth Studies Series). By Mark R. Lindsay and Barth's Theology of Interpretation (Barth Studies Series). By Donald Wood. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 50 (6):1073-1075.
Gerald P. McKenny (2010). The Analogy of Grace: Karl Barth's Moral Theology. Oxford University Press.
S. W. Sykes (2007). Barth's Interpretation of the Bible in Karl Barth : Studies of His Theological Methods. In David Ford (ed.), Shaping Theology: Engagements in a Religious and Secular World. Blackwell Pub.
Paul Brazier (2008). The Resurrection in Karl Barth (Barth Studies Series). By Robert Dale dawsonKarl Barth and Evangelical Theology: Convergences and Divergences. By Sung Chung (Editor). Heythrop Journal 49 (1):141–144.
Simon Fisher (1988). Revelatory Positivism?: Barth's Earliest Theology and the Marburg School. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2010-08-11
Total downloads28 ( #148,017 of 1,934,445 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,193 of 1,934,445 )
How can I increase my downloads?