David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (1):111-112 (2009)
This volume contains ten essays that treat the relationship between Kant’s philosophy and those of his predecessors in the early modern canon. The essays divide into five pairs devoted respectively to Descartes, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, and Hume. In each case, the work of a prominent Kant scholar precedes a reply by an early modernist. This format provides the opportunity to reevaluate both Kant’s philosophy and those of his predecessors, the contention being that the latter “in our historical conscience” too often are read “in light of Kant’s reconstruction of their thought” .In this review, I discuss a selection of the articles in order to evaluate the extent to which they contribute to the stated historiographic aim of the volume. Each of the ten contributions provides a worthwhile read in isolation from the others, but the success they achieve in reassessing the relationship of Kantian to pre-Kantian philosophy varies significantly from essay to essay. Cumulatively, they offer an inspiring retort to the central arguments of that chapter of modern philosophy entitled “On the division of all philosophies into vorkantische and nachkantische
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Anthony Brueckner (2008). Review of Michael N. Forster, Kant and Skepticism. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (7).
Robert B. Louden (2012). Kant's Theory of Virtue: The Value of Autocracy (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 50 (1):142-143.
Paul Guyer (1984). Review: Pippin, Kant's Theory of Form. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 22 (3).
Robert Hanna (2002). Review: Greenberg, Kant's Theory of a Priori Knowledge. [REVIEW] Mind 111 (443):671-675.
Peter Byrne (2007). Review of Kant and the New Philosophy of Religion. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 43 (3):364-367.
Brandon C. Look (2011). Kant's Thinker (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (4):502-503.
Kevin J. Harrelson (2010). Review: Garber & Longuenesse (Ed), Kant and the Early Moderns. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (1):111-112.
Mark Johnson (1987). American Poetics of History: From Emerson to the Moderns (Review). Philosophy and Literature 11 (2):341-343.
Andrew Janiak (2009). Review: Garber & Longuenesse (Eds.), Kant and the Early Moderns. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (2).
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads1 ( #499,222 of 1,410,149 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?