David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy in the Contemporary World 10 (1):29-35 (2003)
The “Idea of Intrinsic Equality” is central to democracy, but in what respects are persons intrinsically equal, and what requirements, if any, does their equality impose on a process for making collective decisions? This paper seeks to answer that question with respect to our own representative democracy. It examines three theories of collective decision-making that arguably characterize the democratic process under the United States Constitution. It concludes that, while all preserve the Idea of Intrinsic Equality in the election of representatives and legislative voting, only the third theory, Democratic Egalitarianism, which treats all like interests alike in promulgating laws and preserves the fundamental liberties of all, both preserves the Idea of Intrinsic Equality throughout the legislative process and fulfills the fiduciary mandate that legislators legislate in the interests of the people
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Thom Brooks (2007). Equality and Democracy. Ethical Perspectives 14 (1):3-12.
Thomas Christiano (2010). The Constitution of Equality: Democratic Authority and Its Limits. OUP Oxford.
Arto Laitinen (2010). Seen to Be Done: The Roots and Fruits of Public Equality. [REVIEW] Res Publica 16 (1):83-88.
Kristian Skagen Ekeli (2005). Giving a Voice to Posterity – Deliberative Democracy and Representation of Future People. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (5):429-450.
Adam Przeworski (2010). Democracy and the Limits of Self-Government. Cambridge University Press.
Elizabeth Anderson (2008). An Epistemic Defense of Democracy: David Estlund's Democratic Authority. Episteme 5 (1):pp. 129-139.
Christophe Premat (2006). Castoriadis and the Modern Political Imaginary—Oligarchy, Representation, Democracy. Critical Horizons 7 (1):251-275.
Barbara J. Thayer-Bacon (2012). Learning to Trust Our Students. Ethics and Education 7 (2):149-161.
Fabienne Peter (2007). The Political Egalitarian's Dilemma. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (4):373 - 387.
Ranjoo Seodu Herr (2010). Confucian Democracy and Equality. Asian Philosophy 20 (3):261-282.
Ian O'Flynn (2010). Deliberating About the Public Interest. Res Publica 16 (3):299-315.
Gerard Casey (2009). "Which is to Be Master?"-The Indefensibility of Political Representation. Philosophical Inquiry 31 (3-4):1-10.
Thomas Christiano (ed.) (2003). Philosophy and Democracy: An Anthology. Oxford University Press.
Aurelian Craiutu (2003). Guizot's Elitist Theory of Representative Government. Critical Review 15 (3-4):261-284.
William Nelson (2008). The Epistemic Value of the Democratic Process. Episteme 5 (1):pp. 19-32.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads6 ( #210,201 of 1,099,541 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #123,840 of 1,099,541 )
How can I increase my downloads?