David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Social Philosophy and Policy 24 (2):220-240 (2007)
This essay deals with Aristotle's complex account in Politics III.4 of the good man and the upright citizen. By this account the goodness of an upright citizen is relative to the city of which he is a citizen, whereas the goodness of a good man is absolute. Aristotle holds that the goodness of a good man and the goodness of an upright citizen are identical in one case only, that of a full citizen of his ideal city. In a non-ideal city the two are always distinct. One would expect, then, that cases would arise where the goodness of an upright citizen would demand, and the goodness of a good man forbid, the very same action. Aristotle, however, never discusses such cases directly, and many scholars have thought that he skirts the issue entirely. I argue, on the contrary, that Aristotle believes that there are cases where a good man will act differently from an upright citizen and that, consequently, he believes, as we would hope he would believe, that there are limits to political obligation. Footnotesa I am indebted to Fred Miller, the other contributors to this volume, and especially my wife, Christine Keyt, for helpful comments on earlier versions of this essay.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Richard T. de George (2008). Reflections on “Citizenship, Inc.”. Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (1):43-50.
Richard T. De George (2008). Reflections on “Citizenship, Inc.”. Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (1):43-50.
Christopher Miles Coope (2001). Good-Bye to the Problem of Evil, Hello to the Problem of Veracity. Religious Studies 37 (4):373-396.
Timothy Chappell (2005). 'The Good Man is the Measure of All Things': Objectivity Without World-Centredness in Aristotle's Moral Epistemology. In Christopher Gill (ed.), Virtue, Norms, and Objectivity: Issues in Ancient and Modern Ethics. Clarendon Press.
Kathleen V. Wilkes (1978). The Good Man and the Good for Man in Aristotle's Ethics. Mind 87 (348):553-571.
Monique Lanoix (2007). The Citizen in Question. Hypatia 22 (4):113-129.
A. F. Mackay (2005). Aristotle's Dilemma. Journal of Ethics 9 (3-4):533 - 549.
Robert Develin (1973). The Good Man and the Good Citizen in Aristotle's "Politics". Phronesis 18 (1):71-79.
Robert Develin (1973). The Good Man and the Good Citizen in Aristotle's "Politics". Phronesis 18 (1):71 - 79.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads75 ( #17,091 of 1,096,520 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #93,642 of 1,096,520 )
How can I increase my downloads?