David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 5:123-131 (2007)
The paper explores the extent to which 'postmodernism' has affected our conception of social theory, especially with regard to the normative assumptions involved in cultural and social interpretation. It makes a proposal about how to redefine normativity after the postmodern challenge. Postmodernist theorists engage in the rejection of trans-contextual notions of truth and universalistic moralities. Yet since these efforts themselves involve commitments to truth and normativity, we might be inclined to reject them as inherently incoherent. A different, more promising road would consist in taking seriously the postmodern critique of reason, and to inquire whether, instead of necessarily implying a total rejection of reason, it suggests a reformulation of the scope and nature of truth and normativity. In this paper, I prepare such a reconceptualization with regard to the issue of normativity. The aim is to sketch a theory of normative commitment as built into our interpretive practices, if understood as the dialogical reconstruction—and thus recognition—of the other's beliefs and assumptions. To make the case for this proposal, I first present, by means of a comparison between modern and postmodern conceptions of social science, an interpretation of the relevance of the postmodern challenge with regard to modern social theory. Based on this, I will sketch a fourfold discursive field of positions addressing the justification of normative perspectives after postmodernism. This discussion will serve as a backdrop against which the concept of a hermeneutic competence of dialogical perspective-assumption can emerge as a plausible candidate for grounding our normative intuitions
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Rekha Mirchandani (2005). Postmodernism and Sociology: From the Epistemological to the Empirical. Sociological Theory 23 (1):86-115.
Stephen K. White (1991). Political Theory and Postmodernism. Cambridge University Press.
Nicos P. Mouzelis (2008). Modern and Postmodern Social Theorizing: Bridging the Divide. Cambridge University Press.
Jason L. Powell (ed.) (2012). Baudrillard and Postmodernism. Nova Science Publishers.
Christine Tappolet & Alan Voizard (2011). The Philosophy of Normativity, or How to Try Clearing Things Up a Little. Dialogue 50 (02):233-238.
John W. Murphy (1989). Postmodern Social Analysis and Criticism. Greenwood Press.
Dirk Richter (1994). Existentialism and Postmodernism. Continuities, Breaks, and Some Consequences for Medical Theory. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 15 (3).
Sara Ahmed (1998). Differences That Matter: Feminist Theory and Postmodernism. Cambridge University Press.
Joseph Rouse (2007). Social Practices and Normativity. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37 (1):46-56.
Simon Malpas (2005). The Postmodern. Routledge.
Warren J. Samuels (1996). Postmodernism and Economics: A Middlebrow View. Journal of Economic Methodology 3 (1):113-120.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads3 ( #224,108 of 1,089,155 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,735 of 1,089,155 )
How can I increase my downloads?