Modality in Aristotle’s De Interpretatione

Abstract
The article investigates the treatment of modality in chapters 12 and 13 of De Interpretatione and gives a new interpretation of the puzzling table of modals to be found at the beginning of chapter 13, as well as dealing with some of Aristotle’s puzzles. This is achieved by extending Aristotle’s distinction between two senses of possibility, which (following Ackrill) I call ‘one-sided’ and ‘two-sided’, to the two notions of necessity and impossibility. The conclusion is reached that, while the two notions of necessity and impossibility are logically incompatible when both are taken as one-sided, in their two-sided senses they are in fact equivalent.
Keywords Logical Relations  Aristotle
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index Translate to english
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive Edward Khamara, Modality in Aristotle’s De Interpretatione
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Jeremy Byrd (2010). The Necessity of Tomorrow's Sea Battle. Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (2):160-176.
J. M. E. Moravcsik (1967). Aristotle. Garden City, N.Y.,Anchor Books.
Jean-Louis Hudry (2011). Aristotle on Meaning. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 93 (3):253-280.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-08-26

Total downloads

152 ( #4,575 of 1,096,870 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

36 ( #2,143 of 1,096,870 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.