David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
This Article explores the process of discovering legal scholarship. One may read, read, and read cases and statutes and articles to generate one's own piece of scholarship. But research, though necessary, does not produce durable scholarship. Lasting scholarship is like discovering penicillin. It is like capturing a fleeting revelation. It is an experience reported in language. True legal scholarship is researched poetry of the highest order. Rumi, Frost, Keats would have been great legal scholars. (This article might benefit new law professors who are striving to make their scholarship float in the ocean of words.).
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Stacey A. Tovino (2007). Functional Neuroimaging and the Law: Trends and Directions for Future Scholarship. American Journal of Bioethics 7 (9):44 – 56.
Stephanie Plotin, Legal Scholarship, Electronic Publishing, and Open Access: Transformation or Steadfast Stagnation?
Alan Strudler (2010). New Directions in Legal Scholarship. Business Ethics Quarterly 20 (3):503-531.
Baruch A. Brody (1990). Quality of Scholarship in Bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (2):161-178.
David M. Levy (2007). No Time to Think: Reflections on Information Technology and Contemplative Scholarship. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 9 (4):237-249.
Bruce Macfarlane & Laura J. Spence (2003). Redefining the Scholarship of Business Ethics: An Editorial. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 48 (1):1-6.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #198,584 of 1,088,785 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?