David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (2):211-231 (2011)
This article explores the role of surface ambiguities in referring expressions, and how the risk of such ambiguities should be taken into account by an algorithm that generates referring expressions, if these expressions are to be optimally effective for a hearer. We focus on the ambiguities that arise when adjectives occur in coordinated structures. The central idea is to use statistical information about lexical co-occurrence to estimate which interpretation of a phrase is most likely for human readers, and to avoid generating phrases where misunderstandings are likely. Various aspects of the problem were explored in three experiments in which responses by human participants provided evidence about which reading was most likely for certain phrases, which phrases were deemed most suitable for particular referents, and the speed at which various phrases were read. We found a preference for ‘‘clear’’ expressions to ‘‘unclear’’ ones, but if several of the expressions are ‘‘clear,’’ then brief expressions are preferred over non-brief ones even though the brief ones are syntactically ambiguous and the non-brief ones are not; the notion of clarity was made precise using Kilgarriff's Word Sketches. We outline an implemented algorithm that generates noun phrases conforming to our hypotheses
|Keywords||Natural language generation Surface realization Ambiguity management Generation of referring expressions Surface ambiguity in gre|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Robert Dale & Ehud Reiter (1995). Computational Interpretations of the Gricean Maxims in the Generation of Referring Expressions. Cognitive Science 19 (2):233-263.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kees van Deemter, Albert Gatt, Ielka van der Sluis & Richard Power (2011). Generation of Referring Expressions: Assessing the Incremental Algorithm. Cognitive Science 36 (5):799-836.
Albert Gatt & Kees van Deemter (2007). Lexical Choice and Conceptual Perspective in the Generation of Plural Referring Expressions. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (4):423-443.
Markus Guhe (2012). Utility-Based Generation of Referring Expressions. Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (2):306-329.
Jan Albert van Laar (2011). Ambiguity in Argument. Argument and Computation 1 (2):125-146.
Arthur Sullivan (2012). Reference and Structure in the Philosophy of Language: A Defense of the Russellian Orthodoxy. Routledge.
Theodore R. Schatzki (1991). Elements of a Wittgensteinian Philosophy of the Human Sciences. Synthese 87 (2):311 - 329.
Delia Graff Fara (2003). Desires, Scope, and Tense. Philosophical Perspectives 17 (1):141-163.
Zsófia Ruttkay (2009). Cultural Dialects of Real and Synthetic Emotional Facial Expressions. AI and Society 24 (3):307-315.
Kirk Ludwig (2000). The Semantics and Pragmatics of Complex Demonstratives. Mind 109 (434):199 - 240.
Ernest Lepore & Kirk Ludwig (2000). The Semantics and Pragmatics of Complex Demonstratives. Mind 109 (434):199-240.
Kees van Deemter (2009). Utility and Language Generation: The Case of Vagueness. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (6):607-632.
Added to index2011-11-11
Total downloads42 ( #113,101 of 1,940,985 )
Recent downloads (6 months)22 ( #25,515 of 1,940,985 )
How can I increase my downloads?