David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (2):149-168 (2012)
In this article I argue that Jürgen Habermas’ notion of morality (moral norms) has more in common with Hegel’s notion of ‘ethical life’ as a ‘ sittlich ’ relation – understood as a socially integrative force – rather than Kant’s supreme principle of personal morality. I show that Habermas and Hegel, each in his own way, make a distinction between morality and ethics. However, I make the case that Habermas’ conception of ‘morality’ incorporates aspects of Hegel’s notion of ‘ethical life’, while Habermas’ conception of ‘ethical’ – referring to individual and group conceptions of the good life – is a remedy to the shortcomings in Hegel’s overly unified ethical life. I offer an alternative reading of Habermas’ principle of morality, which I suggest should be read as his attempt to provide a binding process to set up the norms that ought to condition a modern political community understood as a civil association
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Gulshan Khan (2013). Critical Republicanism: Jürgen Habermas and Chantal Mouffe. Contemporary Political Theory 12 (4):318-337.
Gulshan Khan (2013). Critical Republicanism: J|[Uuml]|Rgen Habermas and Chantal Mouffe. Contemporary Political Theory 12 (4):318.
Roberto Frega (2013). From Normative Spheres to Normative Practices: New Prospects for Normative Theory After Habermas. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 21 (5):680-712.
Similar books and articles
James Gordon Finlayson (2000). Modernity and Morality in Habermas's Discourse Ethics. Inquiry 43 (3):319 – 340.
Max Pensky (2005). Jürgen Habermas, Existential Hero? Radical Philosophy Review 8 (2):197-209.
J. M. Fritzman (2002). Why I Hardly Read Althusser. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 9 (1):47-59.
Stale R. S. Finke (2000). Habermas and Kant: Judgement and Communicative Experience. Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (6):21-45.
Russell Keat (2009). Choosing Between Capitalisms: Habermas, Ethics and Politics. Res Publica 15 (4):355-376.
Logi Gunnarsson (2000). Making Moral Sense: Beyond Habermas and Gauthier. Cambridge University Press.
Jurgen Habermas (2011). Reasonable Versus True, or, The Morality of World Views. In James Gordon Finlayson & Fabian Freyenhagen (eds.), Habermas and Rawls: Disputing the Political. Rouledge
Charles W. Wright (2004). Particularity and Perspective Taking: On Feminism and Habermas's Discourse Theory of Morality. Hypatia 19 (4):47-74.
Keith Breen (2012). Under Weber's Shadow: Modernity, Subjectivity and Politics in Habermas, Arendt and Macintyre. Ashgate.
Cristina Lafont (2003). Procedural Justice?: Implications of the Rawls-Habermas Debate for Discourse Ethics. Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (2):163-181.
John Grumley (2005). Hegel, Habermas and the Spirit of Critical Theory. Critical Horizons 6 (1):87-99.
Farid Abdel-Nour (2004). Farewell to Justification: Habermas, Human Rights, and Universalist Morality. Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (1):73-96.
J. Pedersen (2012). Justification and Application: The Revival of the Rawls-Habermas Debate. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (3):399-432.
Added to index2011-12-17
Total downloads8 ( #409,756 of 1,934,425 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,207 of 1,934,425 )
How can I increase my downloads?