David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (8):585-589 (2008)
Aim: This study explores priority dilemmas in dialysis treatment and care offered elderly patients within the Norwegian public healthcare system.Background: Inadequate healthcare due to advanced age is frequently reported in Norway. The Norwegian guidelines for healthcare priorities state that age alone is not a relevant criterion. However, chronological age, if it affects the risk or effect of medical treatment, can be a legitimate criterion.Method: A qualitative approach is used. Data were collected through semistructured interviews and analysed through hermeneutical content analysis. The informants were five physicians and four nurses from dialysis wards.Findings: Pressing priority dilemmas centre around decision-making concerning withholding and withdrawal of dialysis treatment. Advanced age is rarely an absolute or sole priority criterion. It seems, however, that advanced age appears to be a more subtle criterion in relation with, for example, comorbidity, functional status and cognitive impairment. Nurses primarily prioritise specialised dialysis care and not comprehensive nursing care. The complex needs of elderly patients are therefore often not always met.Conclusions: Clinical priorities should be made more transparent in order to secure legitimate and fair resource allocation in dialysis treatment and care. Difficult decisions concerning withholding or withdrawal of dialysis ought to be openly discussed within the healthcare team as well as with patients and significant others. The biomedical focus and limitations on comprehensive care during dialysis should be debated
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
R. Pedersen, P. Nortvedt, M. Nordhaug, A. Slettebo, K. H. Grothe, M. Kirkevold, B. S. Brinchmann & B. Andersen (2008). In Quest of Justice? Clinical Prioritisation in Healthcare for the Aged. Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (4):230-235.
P. Nortvedt, R. Pedersen, K. H. Grothe, M. Nordhaug, M. Kirkevold, A. Slettebo, B. S. Brinchmann & B. Andersen (2008). Clinical Prioritisations of Healthcare for the Aged--Professional Roles. Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (5):332-335.
Gabriel Eweje & Margaret Brunton (2010). Ethical Perceptions of Business Students in a New Zealand University: Do Gender, Age and Work Experience Matter? Business Ethics 19 (1):95-111.
James S. Leming (1976). An Exploratory Inquiry Into the Multi‐Factor Theory of Moral Behaviour. Journal of Moral Education 5 (2):179-188.
Todd Bernard Weber (2000). Tragic Dilemmas and the Priority of the Moral. Journal of Ethics 4 (3):191-209.
Carl Malinowski & Karen A. Berger (1996). Undergraduate Student Attitudes About Hypothetical Marketing Dilemmas. Journal of Business Ethics 15 (5):525 - 535.
I. V. Pfutzenreuter, The Curious Case of Disparate Impact Under the Adea: Reversing the Theory's Development Into Obsolescence.
Peter Vallentyne (1989). Two Types of Moral Dilemmas. Erkenntnis 30 (3):301 - 318.
Daniel Callahan (2001). Health Care for Children: A Community Perspective. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (2):137 – 146.
Thomas Tomlinson (2007). Futility Beyond CPR: The Case of Dialysis. [REVIEW] HEC Forum 19 (1):33-43.
Kelly Trogdon (2009). Monism and Intrinsicality. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (1):127 – 148.
Shyli Karin-Frank (1995). Social Conflicts, Moral Dilemmas, and Priority Principles. Social Philosophy Today 10:89-103.
Karen Maas (2008). Talk the Walk. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 19:201-216.
Guido Vanheeswijck (2013). Charles Taylor's Dilemmas: A Sequel to A Secular Age. Heythrop Journal 54 (2):435-439.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads1 ( #466,519 of 1,139,993 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #157,514 of 1,139,993 )
How can I increase my downloads?