Similarity versus familiarity: When empathy becomes selfish
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):41-41 (2001)
| Abstract | Preston & de Waal conflate familiarity with similarity in their attempt to account for empathy. If distinguished, we may have at hand two different kinds of empathy: egocentric empathy and empathy proper. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJay Schulkin (2001). Psychobiological Basis of Empathy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):46-47.
Douglas Hollan (2012). Emerging Issues in the Cross-Cultural Study of Empathy. Emotion Review 4 (1):70-78.
Stephanie D. Preston & Frans B. M. de Waal (2001). Empathy: Each is in the Right – Hopefully, Not All in the Wrong. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):49-58.
Nancy Eisenberg (2001). Distinctions Among Various Modes of Empathy-Related Reactions: A Matter of Importance in Humans. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):33-34.
Martin L. Hoffman (2001). How Automatic and Representational is Empathy, and Why. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):38-39.
Jesse Prinz (2011). Against Empathy. Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (s1):214-233.
Evan Thompson (2001). Empathy and Consciousness. Journal Of Consciousness Studies 8 (5-7):1-32.
Hank Davis (2001). Too Early for a Neuropsychology of Empathy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):32-33.
Stephanie D. Preston & Frans B. M. de Waal (2001). Empathy: Its Ultimate and Proximate Bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):1-20.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads33 ( #36,590 of 549,122 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,740 of 549,122 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
