Material Scarcity: A Reason for Responsibility in Technology Development and Product Design [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):1165-1179 (2013)
|Abstract||There are warning signs for impending scarcity of certain technology metals that play a critical role in high-tech products. The scarce elements are indispensable for the design of modern technologies with superior performance. Material scarcity can restrain future innovations and presents therefore a serious risk that must be counteracted. However, the risk is often underrated in the pursuit of technological progress. Many innovators seem to be inattentive to the limitations in availability of critical resources and the possible implications thereof. The present shortages in industrial supply with technology metals may be interpreted as a wake-up call for technology developers to tackle the issue with due consideration. The article reviews the materials scarcity phenomenon from the viewpoint of sustainable development ethics. The following questions are discussed: ‘Should preventative actions be taken today in order to mitigate resource scarcity in future?’ and ‘Should technology developers feel responsible to do this?’ The discussion presents arguments for industrial designers and engineers to create a sense of responsibility for the proactive mitigation of material scarcity. Being protagonists of the innovation system, they have the opportunity to lead change towards resource-aware technology development. The paper concludes by outlining ideas on how they can pioneer sustainable management of critical materials|
|Keywords||Eco-design Eco-innovation PGM REE Resource depletion Precautionary principle Sustainability ethics Sustainable resource management|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Patrick Feng (2000). Rethinking Technology, Revitalizing Ethics: Overcoming Barriers to Ethical Design. Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (2):207-220.
Neelke Doorn (2012). Responsibility Ascriptions in Technology Development and Engineering: Three Perspectives. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (1):69-90.
David M. Kaplan (2009). What Things Still Don't Do. [REVIEW] Human Studies 32 (2):229 - 240.
Michael J. Monahan (2008). Sartre's Critique of Dialectical Reason and the Inevitability of Violence: Human Freedom in the Milieu of Scarcity. Sartre Studies International 14 (2):48-70.
David M. Kaplan (2009). Review: What Things Still Don't Do. [REVIEW] Human Studies 32 (2):229 - 240.
Anders Albrechtslund (2007). Ethics and Technology Design. Ethics and Information Technology 9 (1):63-72.
Asle H. Kiran (2012). Responsible Design. A Conceptual Look at Interdependent Design–Use Dynamics. Philosophy and Technology 25 (2):179-198.
Michael Hampe & Silke Lang (eds.) (2009). The Design of Material, Organism, and Minds: Different Understandings of Design. Springer.
Toni Robertson (2006). Ethical Issues in Interaction Design. Ethics and Information Technology 8 (2):49-59.
Harold Salzman (1991). Engineering Perspectives and Technology Design in the United States. AI and Society 5 (4):339-356.
Berth Jönsson (1982). The Quality of Work Life — the Volvo Experience. Journal of Business Ethics 1 (2):119 - 126.
Mary L. Cummings (2006). Integrating Ethics in Design Through the Value-Sensitive Design Approach. Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (4).
Peter Janich (2003). Technology and Levels of Culture. Poiesis and Praxis 1 (4):263-273.
Barry Allen (2008). Artifice and Design: Art and Technology in Human Experience. Cornell University Press.
Carl Mitcham (1994). Thinking Through Technology: The Path Between Engineering and Philosophy. University of Chicago Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-10-06
Total downloads1 ( #292,381 of 739,352 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,352 )
How can I increase my downloads?