David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Theology 15 (2):273-298 (2003)
Comparisons that have been made between the philosophies of Martin Heidegger and Bernard Lonergan on such topics as transcendence, authenticity, and the inadequacies of substance metaphysics are justified, but they must be understood against the background of a disagreement over the meaning and role of ontological difference. A reading of Heidegger that emphasizes the negative or recessive aspect of the ontological “lighting” or “clearing” in being puts this disagreement into sharp relief and forms a charge against Lonergan of “forgetfulness of being.” A response to the charge is offered in the form of three approximations, focusing, respectively, on the way that Lonergan uses the term, “intelligibility,” the role he gives to question, and the way he finds ontological significance in a particular range of intentional acts
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Stephan Käufer (2005). The Nothing and the Ontological Difference in Heidegger's What is Metaphysics? Inquiry 48 (6):482 – 506.
Joseph J. Kockelmans (ed.) (1972). On Heidegger and Language. Evanston [Ill.]Northwestern University Press.
Patrick H. Byrne (2007). The Goodness of Being in Lonergan's Insight. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81 (1):43-72.
Tad Dunne, Bernard Lonergan. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Patrick H. Byrne (2002). Lonergan's Retrieval of Aristotelian Form. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (3):371-392.
Lubos Rojka (2008). Human Authenticity and the Question of God in the Philosophy of Bernard Lonergan. Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 13 (1):31 - 49.
Teodor Bernardus Baba (2009). The Use of Husserl's Method in Bernard Lonergan's Trinitarian Theology. Philosophy and Theology 21 (1/2):43-104.
Anne van Leeuwen (2010). Sexuate Difference, Ontological Difference: Between Irigaray and Heidegger. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 43 (1):111-126.
Glenn Hughes (2007). Lonergan and Art. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 63 (4):991 - 1000.
Stephen Martin (2010). John Paul II, Milbank and Lonergan. The Lonergan Review 2 (1):315-328.
Greg P. Hodes (2002). Intentional Structure and the Identity Theory of Knowledge in Bernard Lonergan. International Philosophical Quarterly 42 (4):437-452.
Roland Teske (1990). Bradley and Lonergan's Relativist. Philosophy and Theology 5 (2):125-136.
John C. Haughey (2011). The Charism of Bernard Lonergan. The Lonergan Review 3 (1):13-32.
Bernard Lonergan (2011). Letter to Jane Collier. The Lonergan Review 3 (1):191-195.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads22 ( #163,122 of 1,789,836 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #420,676 of 1,789,836 )
How can I increase my downloads?