David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Investigations 35 (2):101-126 (2012)
According to a standard criticism, Robert Brandom's “normative pragmatics”, i.e. his attempt to explain normative statuses in terms of practical attitudes, faces a dilemma. If practical attitudes and their interactions are specified in purely non-normative terms, then they underdetermine normative statuses; but if normative terms are allowed into the account, then the account becomes viciously circular. This paper argues that there is no dilemma, because the feared circularity is not vicious. While normative claims do exhibit their respective authors' practical attitudes and thereby contribute towards establishing the normative statuses they are about, this circularity is not a mark of Brandom's explanatory strategy but a feature of social practice of which we theorists partake
|Keywords||Rule-Following Pragmatism Meaning Value Normative Pragmatics Brandom Social practice|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
David Lewis (1969). Convention: A Philosophical Study. Harvard University Press.
Saul A. Kripke (1980/1998). Naming and Necessity. Harvard University Press.
Robert B. Brandom (1994). Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Harvard University Press.
John McDowell (1994). Mind and World. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Daniel C. Dennett (ed.) (1978). Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology. Bradford Books.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
David Lauer (2009). Genuine Normativity, Expressive Bootstrapping, and Normative Phenomenalism. Etica and Politica / Ethics & Politics 11 (1):321-350.
Greg Restall, A S s E Rt I O N, Denial, Commitment, Entitlement, and Incompatibility (and Some Consequence).
Thomas Fossen (2012). Politicizing Brandom's Pragmatism: Normativity and the Agonal Character of Social Practice. European Journal of Philosophy 20 (4):371-395.
Anandi Hattiangadi (2003). Making It Implicit: Brandom on Rule-Following. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (2):419-31.
Jaroslav Peregrin (2005). Brandom and Davidsom: What Do We Need to Account for Thinking and Agency? Philosophica 75.
Ronald Loeffler (2005). Normative Phenomenalism: On Robert Brandom's Practice-Based Explanation of Meaning. European Journal of Philosophy 13 (1):32-69.
Robert Brandom (2006). Kantian Lessons About Mind, Meaning, and Rationality. Southern Journal of Philosophy 34 (1/2):1-20.
Robert Brandom (2005). Kantian Lessons About Mind, Meaning, and Rationality. Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (Supplement):1-20.
John MacFarlane (2010). Pragmatism and Inferentialism. In Bernhard Weiss & Jeremy Wanderer (eds.), Reading Brandom: On Making It Explici. Routledge 81--95.
Bo Earle (2002). Hegel, Wittgenstein, and the Dialectic of Philosophy and Anthropology. Idealistic Studies 32 (2):101-119.
Francois-Igor Pris (2009). The Mind-Body Problem and Brandom’s Analytic Pragmatism. In Cristina Amoretti, Federico Pitto & Carlo Penco (eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Bob Brandom's Recent Philosophy of Language: Towards an Analytic Pragmatism Genoa, Italy, April 19-23, 2009. University of Genoa, Department of Philosophy 146-151.
Daniel Whiting (2006). Between Primitivism and Naturalism: Brandom's Theory of Meaning. [REVIEW] Acta Analytica 21 (3):3-22.
Hallvard Lillehammer (2002). Moral Realism, Normative Reasons, and Rational Intelligibility. Erkenntnis 57 (1):47-69.
Added to index2011-06-29
Total downloads231 ( #10,510 of 1,793,280 )
Recent downloads (6 months)34 ( #23,339 of 1,793,280 )
How can I increase my downloads?