Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Princeton University Press (1992)
In Philosophical Fragments the pseudonymous author Johannes Climacus explored the question: What is required in order to go beyond Socratic recollection of eternal ideas already possessed by the learner? Written as an afterword to this work, Concluding Unscientific Postscript is on one level a philosophical jest, yet on another it is Climacus's characterization of the subjective thinker's relation to the truth of Christianity. At once ironic, humorous, and polemical, this work takes on the "unscientific" form of a mimical-pathetical-dialectical compilation of ideas. Whereas the movement in the earlier pseudonymous writings is away from the aesthetic, the movement in Postscript is away from speculative thought. Kierkegaard intended Postscript to be his concluding work as an author. The subsequent "second authorship" after The Corsair Affair made Postscript the turning point in the entire authorship. Part One of the text volume examines the truth of Christianity as an objective issue, Part Two the subjective issue of what is involved for the individual in becoming a Christian, and the volume ends with an addendum in which Kierkegaard acknowledges and explains his relation to the pseudonymous authors and their writings. The second volume contains the scholarly apparatus, including a key to references and selected entries from Kierkegaard's journals and papers.
|Keywords||Christianity Philosophy Apologetics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$75.00 used (29% off) $2526.76 new Amazon page|
|Call number||B4373.A472.E5 1992|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Antony Aumann (2009). Kierkegaard's Case for the Irrelevance of Philosophy. Continental Philosophy Review 42 (2):221-248.
Matthew I. Burch (2013). The Existential Sources of Phenomenology: Heidegger on Formal Indication. European Journal of Philosophy 21 (2):258-278.
John Lippitt (2007). Getting the Story Straight: Kierkegaard, Macintyre and Some Problems with Narrative. Inquiry 50 (1):34 – 69.
Tamara Monet Marks (2010). Kierkegaard's "New Argument" for Immortality. Journal of Religious Ethics 38 (1):143-186.
Lee Braver (2012). A Brief History of Continental Realism. Continental Philosophy Review 45 (2):261-289.
Similar books and articles
Søren Kierkegaard (1959). A Kierkegaard Anthology. New York, Modern Library.
Rick Anthony Furtak (ed.) (2010). Kierkegaard's 'Concluding Unscientific Postscript': A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
Edward J. Hughes (1995). How Subjectivity Is Truth in the "Concluding Unscientific Postscript". Religious Studies 31 (2):197 - 208.
John Lippitt (1997). A Funny Thing Happened to Me on the Way to Salvation: Climacus as Humorist in Kierkegaard's Concluding Unscientific Postscript. Religious Studies 33 (2):181-202.
Søren Kierkegaard (1941). Kierkegaard's Concluding Unscientific Postscript. Princeton, Princeton University Press, for American Scandinavian Foundation.
Alexander Pruss, Faith, Paradox, Reason and the Argumentum Spiritus Sancti in Climacus and Kierkegaard.
Jacob Howland (2006). Kierkegaard and Socrates: A Study in Philosophy and Faith. Cambridge University Press.
David R. Law (2010). Making Christianity Difficult: The "Existentialist Theology" of Kierkegaard's Postscript. In Rick Anthony Furtak (ed.), Kierkegaard's 'Concluding Unscientific Postscript': A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press
C. Stephen Evans (2010). Faith and Reason in Kierkegaard's Concluding Unscientific Postscript. In Rick Anthony Furtak (ed.), Kierkegaard's 'Concluding Unscientific Postscript': A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press
Søren Kierkegaard (2009). Concluding Unscientific Postscript to the Philosophical Crumbs. Cambridge University Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?