David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (3):278-294 (2008)
On a contemporary Humean-influenced view, the responses of suitably idealized appreciators are presented as tracking, or even determining, facts about artistic value. Focusing on the intra-personal case, this paper argues that (i) facts about the refinement and reconfiguration of aesthetic character together with (ii) the manner in which autobiography and character are implicated in artistic appreciation make it de facto unlikely that we can reliably come to know how our ideal counterpart would respond to a given artwork. Attribution of superhuman abilities to our ideal counterpart partially addresses this worry, but undermines a central feature of the theoretical motivation for the idealizing model. Insofar as response-dependent accounts of artistic value are inextricably tied to an idealizing view of critics, we have reason to reject them.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
T. Phillips (2011). From the Ideal Market to the Ideal Clinic: Constructing a Normative Standard of Fairness for Human Subjects Research. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (1):79-106.
Wibren van der Burg & Sanne Taekema (2004). Motivation by Ideal. Philosophical Explorations 7 (1):91 – 98.
Mark van Roojen (2000). Motivational Internalism: A Somewhat Less Idealized Account. Philosophical Quarterly 50 (199):233-241.
Ming Dong Gu (2008). The Divine and Artistic Ideal: Ideas and Insights for Cross-Cultural Aesthetic Education. Journal of Aesthetic Education 42 (3):pp. 88-105.
Robert Jubb (2012). Tragedies of Non-Ideal Theory. European Journal of Political Theory 11 (3):229-246.
Steven Arkonovich (2011). Advisors and Deliberation. Journal of Ethics 15 (4):405-424.
Emily Brady (2002). Aesthetic Character and Aesthetic Integrity in Environmental Conservation. Environmental Ethics 24 (1):75-91.
Rachel Zuckert (2005). Boring Beauty and Universal Morality: Kant on the Ideal of Beauty. Inquiry 48 (2):107 – 130.
J. Shelley (2011). Hume and the Value of the Beautiful. British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (2):213-222.
Stephanie Ross (2008). Humean Critics: Real or Ideal? British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (1):20-28.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #53,337 of 1,004,683 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,743 of 1,004,683 )
How can I increase my downloads?