David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy Research Archives 11:1-39 (1985)
This is a critical study of the arguments of Pierre Bayle’s Commentaire philosophique by which he tries to show that someone whose conscience is in error has a moral right (of a limited kind) to do what it commands, and that the act may be morally good; and that others, such as the government, may nevertheless have the right, and a duty, to prevent the act by force
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Gianluca Mori (1997). Pierre Bayle, the Rights of the Conscience, the "Remedy" of Toleration. Ratio Juris 10 (1):45-60.
John Kilcullen (1988). Sincerity and Truth: Essays on Arnauld, Bayle, and Toleration. Oxford University Press.
Pierre Bayle (2005). A Philosophical Commentary on These Words of the Gospel, Luke 14:23, “Compel Them to Come In, That My House May Be Full”. Liberty Fund.
Mark C. Murphy (1997). The Conscience Principle. Journal of Philosophical Research 22:387-407.
John J. Hardt (2008). The Conscience Debate: Resources for Rapprochement From the Problem's Perceived Source. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (3):151-160.
Thomas M. Lennon (1999). Reading Bayle. University of Toronto Press.
Daniel P. Sulmasy (2008). What is Conscience and Why is Respect for It so Important? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (3):135-149.
Michael W. Hickson (2010). The Message of Bayle's Last Title: Providence and Toleration in the Entretiens de Maxime Et de Thémiste. Journal of the History of Ideas 71 (4):547-567.
John Kilcullen (2010). Medieval and Modern Concepts of Rights : How Do They Differ? In Virpi Mäkinen (ed.), The Nature of Rights: Moral and Political Aspects of Rights in Late Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy. The Philosophical Society of Finland.
Michael W. Hickson (2011). Reductio Ad Malum: Bayle's Early Skepticism About Theodicy. Modern Schoolman 88 (3/4):201-221.
Michael W. Hickson & Thomas M. Lennon (2009). The Real Significance of Bayle's Authorship of the Avis. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (1):191 – 205.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads7 ( #195,080 of 1,101,987 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #128,871 of 1,101,987 )
How can I increase my downloads?