Corporate ethics in the era of globalization: The promise and peril of international environmental standards [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (4):425-455 (2001)
The growing assumption thattransnational corporations (TNCs) will apply``best practice'''' and ``international standards''''in their operations in developing countries hasseldom been checked against close observationof corporate behavior. In this article, Ipresent a case study, based on field research,of one voluntary initiative to useinternational standards and best practice forenvironmental protection in the AmazonRainforest, by a US-based oil company,Occidental Petroleum (Oxy) in Ecuador. The moststriking finding is that the company refuses todisclose the precise standards that apply toits operations. This, and the refusal todisclose other important environmentalinformation, make it impossible to verifyindependently Oxy''s claims of environmentalexcellence, or assess the effectiveness of theinitiative. At the same time, Oxy uses theinvocation of international standards to wrapitself in a veneer of corporate responsibility;reassure government officials and localresidents; cultivate confusion about standardsand practices that apply to the operations;deflect meaningful oversight and transparency;and arbitrarily legitimize norms that have beendefined by special interests. In short,international standards offer great promise forneeded environmental improvements; but can alsobe used to impede, rather than advance,corporate responsibility and the development ofeffective environmental law at the nationallevel. These findings suggest that for theapplication of international standards to bemeaningful, the international community needsto move beyond statements of principle anddevelop mechanisms that can be used toevaluate, verify, and monitor independentlyenvironmental claims by TNCs.
|Keywords||Amazonia corporate responsibility community relations Ecuador environmental ethics globalization international environmental law international development oil and gas self-regulation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Oguz Morali & Cory Searcy (2013). A Review of Sustainable Supply Chain Management Practices in Canada. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 117 (3):635-658.
Similar books and articles
Sean Valentine & Gary Fleischman (2008). Professional Ethical Standards, Corporate Social Responsibility, and the Perceived Role of Ethics and Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 82 (3):657 - 666.
Andreas Rasche (2010). The Limits of Corporate Responsibility Standards. Business Ethics 19 (3):280-291.
Ian Maitland (2005). Corporate Codes of Conduct. International Corporate Responsibility Series 2:65-78.
Vladimir Petkoski (2007). From International Corporate Responsibility to Local CSR. International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:283-295.
Sandra Waddock (2011). Accountability in a Global Economy. Business Ethics Quarterly 21 (1):23-44.
Thomas Donaldson (1992). The Language of International Corporate Ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly 2 (3):271-281.
Martin Mueller, Virginia Gomes dos Santos & Stefan Seuring (2009). The Contribution of Environmental and Social Standards Towards Ensuring Legitimacy in Supply Chain Governance. Journal of Business Ethics 89 (4):509 - 523.
Cathy A. Rusinko & John O. Matthews (2008). Corporate Sustainability Disclosure Standards. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 19:335-342.
Charles P. Koerber (2009). Corporate Responsibility Standards: Current Implications and Future Possibilities for Peace Through Commerce. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 89 (4):461 - 480.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads37 ( #39,233 of 1,088,854 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,666 of 1,088,854 )
How can I increase my downloads?