Governance of Nanotechnology and Nanomaterials: Principles, Regulation, and Renegotiating the Social Contract
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 37 (4):706-723 (2009)
Good governance for nanotechnology and nanomaterials is predicated on principles of general good governance. This paper discusses on what lessons we can learn from the oversight of past emerging technologies in formulating these principles. Nanotechnology provides us a valuable opportunity to apply these lessons and a duty to avoid repeating past mistakes. To do that will require mandatory regulation, grounded in precaution, that takes into account the uniqueness of nanomaterials. Moreover, this policy dialogue is not taking place in a vacuum. In applying the lessons of the past, nanotechnology provides a window to renegotiate our public's social contract on chemicals, health, the environment, and risks. Emerging technologies illuminate structural weaknesses, providing a crucial chance to ameliorate lingering regulatory inadequacies and provide much needed updates of existing laws
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Evisa Kica & Diana M. Bowman (2013). Transnational Governance Arrangements: Legitimate Alternatives to Regulating Nanotechnologies? [REVIEW] NanoEthics 7 (1):69-82.
Deborah A. Kissinger (2003). Renegotiating the Social Contract: Hobbes to Rawls. Dissertation, University of Hawai'i
Patrick Lin (2007). Nanotechnology Bound: Evaluating the Case for More Regulation. [REVIEW] NanoEthics 1 (2):105-122.
David Hess (2008). The Three Pillars of Corporate Social Reporting as New Governance Regulation. Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (4):447-482.
Ineke Malsch (2013). Governing Nanotechnology in a Multi-Stakeholder World. NanoEthics 7 (2):161-172.
Diana M. Bowman & Karinne Ludlow (2009). Filling the Information Void: Using Public Registries as a Tool in Nanotechnologies Regulation. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (1):25-36.
E. Schuller (2004). Perception of Risk and Nanotechnology. In Baird D. (ed.), Discovering the Nanoscale. Ios
Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1974). The Social Contract: Or, Principles of Political Right. New American Library.
Phil Macnaghten, , Matthew B. Kearnes & Brian Wynne, Nanotechnology, Governance, and Public Deliberation: What Role for the Social Sciences?
Ana Viseu & Heather Maguire (2012). Integrating and Enacting 'Social and Ethical Issues' in Nanotechnology Practices. NanoEthics 6 (3):195-209.
Pleshette DeArmitt (2004). Renegotiating the Contract. Southern Journal of Philosophy 42 (S1):116-121.
Ellen-Marie Forsberg (2012). Standardisation in the Field of Nanotechnology: Some Issues of Legitimacy. Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4):719-739.
David Hess (2007). Social Reporting and New Governance Regulation. Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (3):453-476.
Robert Sparrow (2009). The Social Impacts of Nanotechnology: An Ethical and Political Analysis. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (1):13-23.
John T. Sanders (2007). Contracting Justice. In Malcolm Murray (ed.), Liberty, Games, and Contracts: Jan Narveson and the Defence of Libertarianism. Ashgate
Added to index2010-09-13
Total downloads11 ( #300,968 of 1,793,065 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #463,661 of 1,793,065 )
How can I increase my downloads?