David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Philosophical Research 27:65-81 (2002)
The third section of the Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals presents a particularly acute interpretative problem that has perplexed generations of Kant commentators. Having devoted the two preceding sections of the work to identifying the supreme principle of morality, Kant, in this section, turns to the task of justifying the principle for rational yet sensually affected beings like humans. However, in the middle of this famous “deduction,” he suddenly confesses that “there is a hidden circle” from which “there is no escape.” Kant’s abrupt confession of the circle leaves the reader deeply puzzled, partly because Kant has so confidently presented his arguments for our subjection to the constraints of the supreme principle of morality up to that point, and partly because no clues are readily apparent as to what the mistake in the arguments might be. Where is the circle located? In this paper I tackle Kant’s problem of the hidden circle in the Foundations. In particular, I will identify and critically discuss three influential interpretations of the fallacy of circularity and offer an alternative reading of Kant’s way out of the problem
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Avery Goldman (2010). Kant, Heidegger, and the Circularity of Transcendental Inquiry. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (1):107-120.
Allen W. Wood (2006). The Supreme Principle of Morality. In Paul Guyer (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. 342--80.
Kenneth R. Westphal (1995). Kant's Dynamic Constructions. Journal of Philosophical Research 20:381-429.
Samuel J. Kerstein (2002). Kant's Search for the Supreme Principle of Morality. Cambridge University Press.
Garrath Williams (1999). Nietzsche's Response to Kant's Morality. Philosophical Forum 30 (3):201–216.
Kenneth R. Westphal (1995). ‘Kant’s Proof of the Law of Inertia’. In H. Robinson (ed.), Proceedings of the 8th International Kant Congress. Marquette University Press.
Chin-Tai Kim (1968). Kant's “Supreme Principle of Morality”. Kant-Studien 59 (1-4):296-308.
Immanuel Kant (2007). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Late Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary. Blackwell Pub. Ltd..
M. Carrier (2003). How to Tell Causes From Effects: Kant's Causal Theory of Time and Modern Approaches. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (1):59-71.
William Henry Werkmeister (1974). Kant as Philosophical Anthropologist, And: Kant's Principle of Personality, And: Kant Et le Problème du Mal, And: The Notion of Form in Kant's Critique of Aesthetic Judgment, And: Immanuel Kant: Briefwechsel (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 12 (3):405-410.
Robert B. Louden (2003). Review: Kerstein, Kant's Search for the Supreme Principle of Morality: Kant's Search for the Supreme Principle of Morality. Ethics 113 (4):885-887.
Paul Guyer (2007). Naturalistic and Transcendental Moments in Kant's Moral Philosophy. Inquiry 50 (5):444 – 464.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads6 ( #234,534 of 1,679,333 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #78,911 of 1,679,333 )
How can I increase my downloads?