Philosophy 83 (4):439-458 (2008)
|Abstract||From the Lockean point of view, the mind-body problem is conceived as a problem created by us. It is an error to think there is a problem with mind and body, an error of confusing nominality with reality. I argue that Locke’s agnosticism should be understood as a warning not to confuse our human point of view with what really is. From this perspective, the mind-body problem is a nominal problem, not a real one. It appears to us as a problem, but is not really so. But what makes it appear to us as a problem? This is Locke’s starting point for solving the mind-body problem.|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Sergio Moravia & Scott Staton (1995). The Enigma of the Mind: The Mind-Body Problem in Contemporary Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Olga Markić (2004). Crane on the Mind-Body Problem and Emergence. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 4 (2):199-205.
Han-Kyul Kim (2010). What Kind of Philosopher Was Locke on Mind and Body? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (2):180-207.
Richard Warner & Tadeusz Szubka (eds.) (1994). The Mind-Body Problem: A Guide to the Current Debate. Blackwell.
Alex Byrne (2006). Color and the Mind-Body Problem. Dialectica 60 (2):223-44.
Erik Myin (1998). Trading in Form for Content and Taking the Sting Out of the Mind-Body Problem. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):766-766.
Colin McGinn (1989). Can We Solve the Mind-Body Problem? Mind 98 (July):349-66.
Gabriel Vacariu (2011). The Mind-Body Problem Today. Open Journal of Philosophy 1 (1):26-34.
Jason L. Megill (2005). Locke's Mysterianism: On the Unsolvability of the Mind-Body Problem. Locke Studies 5:119-147.
Benny Shanon (2008). Mind-Body, Body-Mind: Two Distinct Problems. Philosophical Psychology 21 (5):697 – 701.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads82 ( #11,433 of 722,827 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,827 )
How can I increase my downloads?