David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Moral Education 17 (2):105-113 (1988)
Abstract Bentham's utilitarianism, although castigated by Marx as a shopkeeper's rhetoric, maintained an invincible sway over its epigones particularly in their argumentations on moral and political matters. With the disappearance of the free market in the classical sense, however, it is rather J. S. Mill's revised hedonism than the orthodox Benthamite doctrine that has provided more interesting issues for moral and political contemplation. The duality of Mill's theoretical character ? liberal as well as authoritarian ? originated from his differentiation of qualities in the essentially quantitative concept of utilitarian ?pleasure?. This paper concerns itself with the negative and unsuccessful aspects of Mill's deliberations. Mill developed a theory of moral rule for the purpose of generalizing high quality pleasures to society at large. Nevertheless, according to this paper, he ended up leaving us with uncertainty regarding how the ignorant mass could be led to higher quality pleasures
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Richard B. Brandt (1959). Ethical Theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,Prentice-Hall.
D. G. Brown (1982). Mill's Criterion of Wrong Conduct. Dialogue 21 (01):27-44.
R. F. Harrod (1936). Utilitarianism Revised. Mind 45 (178):137-156.
John Kilcullen (1983). Utilitarianism and Virtue. Ethics 93 (3):451-466.
David Lyons (1965). Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Ki Kim (1990). J. S. Mill's Concept of Maturity as the Criterion in Determining Children's Eligibility for Rights. Journal of Philosophy of Education 24 (2):235-244.
Similar books and articles
John Stuart Mill (2009). Utilitarianism. In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring Philosophy: An Introductory Anthology. Oxford University Press.
Steven D. Hales (2007). Mill V. Miller, or Higher and Lower Pleasures. In Steven Hales (ed.), Beer & Philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell.
Daniel Jacobson (2003). J.S. Mill and the Diversity of Utilitarianism. Philosophers' Imprint 3 (2):1-18.
Dale E. Miller (2010). Brown on Mill's Moral Theory: A Critical Response. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 9 (1):47-66.
David Lyons (1994). Rights, Welfare, and Mill's Moral Theory. Oxford University Press.
Ben Eggleston (2010). Rules and Their Reasons : Mill on Morality and Instrumental Rationality. In Ben Eggleston, Dale E. Miller & D. Weinstein (eds.), John Stuart Mill and the Art of Life. Oxford University Press.
Christoph Schmidt-Petri (2006). On an Interpretation of Mill's Qualitative Utilitarianism. Prolegomena 5 (2):165-177.
Jonathan Webber (2010). Character. The Philosophers' Magazine (50):112-113.
Christoph Schmidt-Petri (2003). Mill on Quality and Quantity. Philosophical Quarterly 53 (210):102-104.
Deni Elliott (2007). Getting Mill Right. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 22 (2 & 3):100 – 112.
Daniel Jacobson (2008). Utilitarianism Without Consequentialism: The Case of John Stuart Mill. Philosophical Review 117 (2):159-191.
Ville Kilkku (2004). The Significance of Tendencies and Intentions in the Moral Philosophy of J. S. Mill. Utilitas 16 (1):80-95.
Jonathan Riley (2003). Interpreting Mill's Qualitative Hedonism. Philosophical Quarterly 53 (212):410–418.
Jonathan Riley (2010). Mill's Extraordinary Utilitarian Moral Theory. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 9 (1):67-116.
S. Evan Kreider (2011). Mill on Happiness. Philosophical Papers 39 (1):53-68.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads6 ( #203,575 of 1,101,064 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #115,886 of 1,101,064 )
How can I increase my downloads?