David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
This thesis explores the possibilities for normative grounding of authority through a focus on the relationship between Habermas’s ‘critical theory’ and Gadamer’s ‘philosophical hermeneutics’, with particular reference to the bases of authority in East Asian culture. More specifically, it examines the role of reason and tradition in justifying political authority. Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics locates the conditions of authority in tradition, constituted in part by prejudice, while Habermas offers a theory of communicative action that transcends the limited horizons of tradition. The distinction between reason and tradition is applied in East Asian culture through an analysis of the practice of filial piety. The thesis endorses Habermas’s charge that Gadamer hypostatizes tradition. Habermas correctly identifies the political implication of Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics, namely, that it obscures power relations. It is argued that Habermas’s ‘communicative action theory’ and ‘discourse ethics’ are better able to do justice to the basis for the normative grounding of authority. The relevance of discourse ethics for the justification of political authority in East Asian culture is explored
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
G. Duke (2014). Gadamer and Political Authority. European Journal of Political Theory 13 (1):25-40.
Robert Piercey (2004). Ricoeur's Account of Tradition and the Gadamer–Habermas Debate. Human Studies 27 (3):259-280.
Devrim Sezer (2006). Tradition and Dialogue in Gadamer, Heidegger and Habermas. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:105-110.
I. I. I. Mootz, The Ontological Basis of Legal Hermeneutics: A Proposed Model of Inquiry Based on the Work of Gadamer, Habermas and Ricoeur.
I. I. I. Mootz, Gadamer's Rhetorical Conception of Hermeneutics as the Key to Developing a Critical Hermeneutics.
Richard E. Palmer (2002). A Response to Richard Wolin on Gadamer and the Nazis. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 10 (4):467 – 482.
Alan K. L. Chan (2000). Confucian Ethics and the Critique of Ideology. Asian Philosophy 10 (3):245 – 261.
Jeffery Nicholas (2012). Reason, Tradition, and the Good: Macintyre's Tradition-Constituted Reason and Frankfurt School Critical Theory. University of Notre Dame Press.
Zhenhua Yu (2005). Tradition, Authority and Originality in a Post-Critical Perspective. Tradition and Discovery 32 (3):40-56.
J. Trejo-Mathys (2012). Towards a Discourse-Theoretical Account of Authority and Obligation in the Postnational Constellation. Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (6):537-567.
David Roberts (ed.) (1995). Reconstructing Theory: Gadamer, Habermas, Luhmann. Melbourne University Press.
Austin Harrington (2000). Objectivism in Hermeneutics? Gadamer, Habermas, Dilthey. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 30 (4):491-507.
Added to index2011-09-02
Total downloads28 ( #140,766 of 1,906,958 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #129,680 of 1,906,958 )
How can I increase my downloads?