David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 109 (2):203-208 (2012)
Many employees with strong religious convictions find themselves living in two separate worlds: the sacred private world of family and church where they can express their faith freely and the secular public world where religious expression is strongly discouraged. We examine the origins of sacred/secular divide, and show how this division is an outcome of modernism replacing Christianity as the dominant worldview in western society. Next, we make the case that guiding assumptions (or faith) is inherent in every worldview, system of thought, or religion and also show that scientific reason can never be a comprehensive or totalizing meaning system, particularly in the realm of ethics. The underlying assumptions of the sacred/secular divide are seriously questioned which has implications for employees who desire to integrate faith and career. Finally, we offer possibilities for individuals and corporate entities to integrate the personal and sacred with the institutional and secular.
|Keywords||Sacred/secular Christianity Religion Modernism Reason Faith Worldview|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Thomas S. Kuhn (1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
Jürgen Habermas (2014). An Awareness of What is Missing: Faith and Reason in a Post-Secular Age. Polity.
Donelson R. Forsyth (1992). Judging the Morality of Business Practices: The Influence of Personal Moral Philosophies. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 11 (5-6):461 - 470.
S. Brammer, Geoffrey Williams & John Zinkin (2007). Religion and Attitudes to Corporate Social Responsibility in a Large Cross-Country Sample. Journal of Business Ethics 71 (3):229 - 243.
William James (1907). Pragmatism. Dover Publications.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Brian T. Trainor (2007). Theorising Post-Secular Society. Philosophy and Theology 19 (1/2):95-124.
Bradford McCall (2012). Celebrating Life: Beyond the Sacred-Secular Divide. By Graham Buxton. Pp. Xi, 219, London: Paternoster, 2007, $12.95. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 53 (6):1057-1058.
Eli Rozik (2011). Sacred Narratives in Secular Contexts. The European Legacy 16 (6):769 - 784.
James Halteman (2001). A Mennonite Approach to Business Ethics. Spiritual Goods 2001:275-291.
Donald A. Crosby (2011). Faith and Reason: Their Roles in Religious and Secular Life. State University of New York Press.
Joseph Prabhu (2010). Hegel's Secular Theology. Sophia 49 (2):217–29.
Louis H. Swartz (2000). Reflections on Shils, Sacred and Civil Ties, and Universities. Tradition and Discovery 27 (1):7-12.
Brian T. Trainor (2011). Augustine's 'Sacred Reign‐Secular Rule' Conception of the State; a Bridge From the West's' Foundational Roots to its Post‐Secular Destiny, and Between 'the West' and 'the Rest'. Heythrop Journal 54 (5):373-387.
Robert Merrihew Adams (1995). Moral Horror and the Sacred. Journal of Religious Ethics 23 (2):201 - 224.
Adnan Aslan (1998). Religious Pluralism in Christian and Islamic Philosophy: The Thought of John Hick and Seyyed Hossein Nasr. Curzon.
Ben Rogers (ed.) (2004). Is Nothing Sacred? Routledge.
David Kim, Dan Fisher & David McCalman (2009). Modernism, Christianity, and Business Ethics: A Worldview Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 90 (1):115 - 121.
Herbert Fingarette (1972). Confucius--The Secular as Sacred. New York,Harper & Row.
Added to index2011-11-20
Total downloads40 ( #103,224 of 1,907,187 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #161,266 of 1,907,187 )
How can I increase my downloads?