What Could Pair a Nonphysical Soul to a Physical Body?

In Keith Augustine & Michael Martin (eds.), The Myth of an Afterlife: The Case against Life After Death. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 335-347 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues that since nonphysical souls lack a position in space, they cannot have the pairing relations that would allow them to interact with physical bodies. For example, if two rifles (A and B) are fired at the same time, and consequently Andy and Buddy are killed, we can only say that rifle A killed Andy while rifle B killed Buddy, rather than the other way around, if there are appropriate spatial relations (such as distance and orientation) that pair Andy’s death to A’s firing, and Buddy’s death to B’s firing. But no such pairing relations are available to nonphysical minds that lack spatial positions altogether. And attributing spatial location to nonphysical souls raises more problems than it solves, such as how to find particular souls at particular locations, how souls taken to be geometric points in space could retain enough structure to have sufficient causal powers to influence bodies, and why spatial entities more robust than points shouldn’t simply be conceived of as exotic physical entities like astral bodies. 1. The Problem -- 2. Descartes and Mental Causation -- 3. Causation and the “Pairing” Problem -- 4. Causation and Space -- 5. Can We Locate Souls in Space?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Nonphysical Souls Would Violate Physical Laws.David L. Wilson - 2015 - In Keith Augustine & Michael Martin (eds.), The Myth of an Afterlife: The Case against Life After Death. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 349-367.
There is No Trace of Any Soul Linked to the Body.David Papineau - 2015 - In Keith Augustine & Michael Martin (eds.), The Myth of an Afterlife: The Case against Life After Death. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 369-376.
Dualism.David M. Rosenthal - 1998 - In Edward Craig (ed.), The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Routledge.
Kim against dualism.David Jehle - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 130 (3):565-78.
No Pairing Problem.Andrew M. Bailey, Joshua Rasmussen & Luke Van Horn - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 154 (3):349-360.
Hume on what there is.V. C. Chappell - 1971 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 5:88-98.
Hume on what there is.V. C. Chappell - 1971 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 5:88-98.
What are physical objects?Ned Markosian - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (2):375-395.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-07

Downloads
76 (#213,443)

6 months
10 (#257,583)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jaegwon Kim
Last affiliation: Brown University

Citations of this work

Evidence or Prejudice? A Reply to Matlock. [REVIEW]Keith Augustine - 2016 - Journal of Parapsychology 80:203-231.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Descartes: A Study of His Philosophy.Anthony Kenny (ed.) - 1968 - South Bend, Ind.: St. Augustine's Press.
Causation, nomic subsumption, and the concept of event.Jaegwon Kim - 1973 - Journal of Philosophy 70 (8):217-236.
From Descartes to Hume.L. E. Loeb - 1981 - Ithaca & London.
Psychophysical causal relations.John A. Foster - 1968 - American Philosophical Quarterly 5 (1):64-70.
The downfall of Cartesianism 1673–1712.Richard A. Watson - 1966 - The Hague,: Martinus Nijhoff.

Add more references