David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Augustine and Anselm form a common tradition in mediæval thought about angelic sin, a tradition rooted in patristic thought and centred on their attempts to give a philosophically coherent account of moral choice. Augustine concentrates on the reasons and causes of angelic sin, especially in reference to free will; Anselm adopts Augustine’s analysis and extends it to issues about the rationality of sinful choice. Each takes Lucifer’s primal sin to be the paradigm case. Lucifer, undistracted by bodily desires and unencumbered by history, committed the first moral misdeed in an entirely good universe newly created by an entirely good God. The challenge is to give a philosophical account that permits us to understand how the best and brightest of all angels nevertheless made a sinful choice in such uniformly positive circumstances.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Lawrence Pasternack (2012). Kant on the Debt of Sin. Faith and Philosophy 29 (1):30-52.
Simon Heans (2013). Original Sin or Original Sinfulness? A Comment. Heythrop Journal 54 (1):55-69.
Scott MacDonald (2003). Petit Larceny, the Beginning of All Sin: Augustine's Theft of the Pears. Faith and Philosophy 20 (4):393-414.
Stan R. Tyvoll (2006). Anselm's Definition of Free Will. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 80 (2):155-171.
Hugh J. McCann (2009). God, Sin, and Rogers on Anselm. Faith and Philosophy 26 (4):420-431.
William S. Babcock (1988). Augustine on Sin and Moral Agency. Journal of Religious Ethics 16 (1):28-55.
Katherin A. Rogers (2007). God is Not the Author of Sin: An Anselmian Response to McCann. Faith and Philosophy 24 (3):300-310.
Katherin A. Rogers (2007). God is Not the Author of Sin. Faith and Philosophy 24 (3):300-310.
Tobias Hoffmann (2007). Aquinas and Intellectual Determinism: The Test Case of Angelic Sin. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 89 (2):122-156.
Added to index2009-12-17
Total downloads45 ( #90,529 of 1,792,026 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #344,915 of 1,792,026 )
How can I increase my downloads?