David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1 (4):93-112 (1998)
Power consists in the capacity of A to command B, even against B's wishes, whether directly or indirectly. Questions to do with who possesses it and in what degree are obscured by inflationary shifts of definition (as where power encompasses action as such, or right action, or co?operation). These misjudged moves are generally marked by the assumption that democracy displaces power. But if democracy ultimately persists as a voting procedure, its object is to create power?holders. Democracy may endorse three electoral principles: (a) majority rule, or (b) enhanced majority rule, or (c) unanimity. Its commonest electoral device is (a), but its strongest moral defence for (a) implicitly is (c), which legitimates forms of (d) veto and forms of minority rule. If (d) is fair, this need not follow from (a). Nor is (a) right in virtue of superior power. Democracy is commonly a combination of (a) plus (e) defence of individual and corporate rights. But this combination, while apt and convenient, is not incontestably coherent. Despite growing support for deliberation over election, if democracy must be impelled by (a), thus far does it sustain, not topple, power. If power persists more stably under democracies than elsewhere, sustained caution in regard to its supposed ?circularization? is fully warranted
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Dennis J. Schmidt (2008). Who Counts? On Democracy, Power, and the Incalculable. Research in Phenomenology 38 (2):228-243.
Nicholas Southwood (2013). Democracy as a Modally Demanding Value. Noûs 47 (2):n/a-n/a.
Brian Barry (2002). Capitalists Rule Ok? Some Puzzles About Power. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 1 (2):155-184.
Melvin L. Rogers (2011). The Fact of Sacrifice and Necessity of Faith: Dewey and the Ethics of Democracy. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 47 (3):274-300.
Shuifa Han (2008). The Concept of Democracy. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (4):622-632.
Preston King (1998). Overwhelming Power: Part One ‐ Inflationary Tactics. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1 (1):1-27.
Tim Heysse (2006). Consensus and Power in Deliberative Democracy. Inquiry 49 (3):265 – 289.
Han Shuifa & Hu Jinglei (2008). The Concept of Democracy. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (4):622 - 632.
Jitendra Nath Sarker (2006). Majority Rule and Minority Rights. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:169-173.
Wim Dubbink (2005). Democracy and Private Discretion in Business. Business Ethics Quarterly 15 (1):37-66.
Brian Barry (2003). Capitalists Rule. Ok? A Commentary on Keith Dowding. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 2 (3):323-341.
Jeremy Moon & Bruce Stone (eds.) (2002). Power and Freedom in Modern Politics. University of Western Australia Press.
Subhabrata Bobby Banerjee (2010). Governing the Global Corporation. Business Ethics Quarterly 20 (2):265-274.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-10-19
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?