David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Faith and Philosophy 24 (3):247-267 (2007)
The Doctrine of Original Sin seems to require that human nature has literally undergone a change from its prelapsarian to its postlapsarian condition.It is not clear that this claim makes sense. How can human nature, the feature(s) in virtue of which human beings are what they are, change in time? (Think of the parallel claim about √2.) I consider three medieval attempts to resolve this problem: (1) Augustine’s two theories about shared human nature; (2) Anselm’s proposal that original sin is an individual deficiency; (3) the “biological” proposal suggested by Odo of Cambrai and developed by Pseudo-Joscelin
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Peter King (2007). Damaged Goods. Faith and Philosophy 24 (3):247-267.
María José Alcaraz León (2011). Morally Wrong Beauty as a Source of Value. Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 22 (40-41).
Roberta M. Berry (2009). Pt. 3. The Malleability of Human Nature. Reflections on Secular Foundationalism and Our Human Future / Stephen Erickson ; Nature as Second Nature : Plasticity and Habit / Peter Wake ; The Posthumanist Challenge to a Partly Naturalized Virtue Ethics. [REVIEW] In Mark J. Cherry (ed.), The Normativity of the Natural: Human Goods, Human Virtues, and Human Flourishing. Springer
John Nolt (2010). Hope, Self-Transcendence and Environmental Ethics. Inquiry 53 (2):162 – 182.
Timothy F. Murphy (2012). The Ethics of Impossible and Possible Changes to Human Nature. Bioethics 26 (4):191-197.
James Stillwaggon (2014). The Problem of Propagation: Original Sin as Inherited Discourse. Studies in Philosophy and Education 33 (1):61-73.
Camille Atkinson (2007). Kant on Human Nature and Radical Evil. Philosophy and Theology 19 (1/2):215-224.
Jack Green Musselman (2009). Pt. 1. Thomistic Foundations : Natural Law Theory, Synderesis and Practical Reason. Human Nature and its Limits / Christopher Tollefsen ; Synderesis, Law, and Virtue / Angela McKay ; Human Nature and Moral Goodness / Patrick Lee ; Natural Law for Teaching Ethics : An Essential Tool and Not a Seamless Web. [REVIEW] In Mark J. Cherry (ed.), The Normativity of the Natural: Human Goods, Human Virtues, and Human Flourishing. Springer
Ian A. Smith (2010). The Role of Humility and Intrinsic Goods in Preserving Endangered Species. Environmental Ethics 32 (2):165-182.
Michael C. Rea (2007). The Metaphysics of Original Sin. In Peter Van Inwagen & Dean Zimmerman (eds.), Persons: Human and Divine. Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press ; 319--356.
Hugh J. McCann (2009). God, Sin, and Rogers on Anselm. Faith and Philosophy 26 (4):420-431.
William J. Zanardi (2009). Pt. 2. Human Goods and Human Flourishing : Revitalizing a Fallen Moral Culture. Quid Ipse Sis Nosse Desisti / Douglas V. Henry ; Preparation for the Cure / Anthony E. Giampietro ; Diagnosing Cultural Progress and Decline. [REVIEW] In Mark J. Cherry (ed.), The Normativity of the Natural: Human Goods, Human Virtues, and Human Flourishing. Springer
James Wetzel (1995). Moral Personality, Perversity, and Original Sin. Journal of Religious Ethics 23 (1):3 - 25.
Peter C. Phan (1995). Is Karl Rahner's Doctrine of Sin Orthodox? Philosophy and Theology 9 (1/2):223-236.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads9 ( #444,433 of 1,941,077 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #458,098 of 1,941,077 )
How can I increase my downloads?