Empedocles' Sun

Classical Quarterly 44 (02):316- (1994)
Abstract
Few things can be more confusing, or confused, than the ancient reports about Empedocles' astronomy. Attempts in the modern literature at resolving the difficulties invariably either add to the confusion, or end by urging the need to ‘acknowledge the insufficiency of our data and suspend judgment’. In fact, as we will see, it is possible not only to reconstruct Empedocles' own ideas but also to retrace the history of their subsequent misunderstanding
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 13,009
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA
Spyridon Rangos (2012). Empedocles on Divine Nature. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 3 (3):315-338.
Similar books and articles
Catherine Osborne (1987). Empedocles Recycled. Classical Quarterly 37 (01):24-.
Gordon Campbell, Empedocles. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Daniel Graham (2007). The Sun's Light in Early Greek Thought. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 10:45-50.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-12-09

Total downloads

37 ( #54,577 of 1,410,123 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #177,589 of 1,410,123 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.