Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (4):464-479 (2006)
|Abstract||In his recent review of my book, The Structure of Social Theory , Karsten Stueber rejected my criticisms of contemporary social theory. Against my "hermeneutic" sociology which prioritizes human social relations, he advocates a return to a dualistic ontology of structure and agency. This reply addresses Stuebers criticisms to re-affirm the ontology of social relations against ontological dualism. Key Words: structure agency hermeneutics social relations.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Philip K. Bock (1967). Three Descriptive Models of Social Structure. Philosophy of Science 34 (2):168-174.
Guy A. M. Widdershoven (1985). Handlung Und Struktur. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 16 (1):96-112.
Colin Wight (2006). Agents, Structures and International Relations: Politics as Ontology. Cambridge University Press.
Sharon Hays (1994). Structure and Agency and the Sticky Problem of Culture. Sociological Theory 12 (1):57-72.
Anthony King (2000). The Accidental Derogation of the Lay Actor: A Critique of Giddens's Concept of Structure. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 30 (3):362-383.
Gil Friedman (1997). Agency, Structure, and International Politics: From Ontology to Empirical Inquiry. Routledge.
Anthony King (2006). Review Essay: High-Heeled Red Imitation-Crocodile Boots: The Future of the Social Sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (3):367-378.
Karsten R. Stueber (2006). How to Structure a Social Theory?: A Critical Response to Anthony King’s the Structure of Social Theory. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (1):95-104.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #58,654 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?