David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 18 (2):109-132 (1987)
introduced the concept of effective demand in the nascent science of economics; his discussions of astronomy were acute enough to raise Duhem’s interest. Neither are Buridan’s credentials as a nominalist in doubt, although investigation into his precise relation to William of Ockham continues: he rejected all abstract entities, whether universals, common natures, the complexe significabile, or types above and beyond tokens; for Buridan, every thing which exists is a concrete individual. His anti-realism included an epistemological component as well, for Buridan maintained that the source of all knowledge is experience.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
T. Kermit Scott (1971). Nicholas of Autrecourt, Buridan and Ockhamism. Journal of the History of Philosophy 9 (1):15-41.
Eileen Serene (1982). Demonstrative Science. In Norman Kretzmann, Anthony Kenny & Jan Pinborg (eds.), Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge 496--517.
Paul Vincent Spade (1982). The Semantics of Terms. In Norman Kretzmann, Anthony Kenny & Jan Pinborg (eds.), Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge
John Trentman (1970). Ockham on Mental. Mind 79 (316):586-590.
Citations of this work BETA
Robert Pasnau (2010). Medieval Social Epistemology:Scientia for Mere Mortals. Episteme 7 (1):23-41.
Similar books and articles
Michael J. Fitzgerald (2006). Problems with Temporality and Scientific Propositions in John Buridan and Albert of Saxony. Vivarium 44 (s 2-3):305-337.
Jean Buridan (1982). John Buridan on Self-Reference: Chapter Eight of Buridan's Sophismata, with a Translation, an Introduction, and a Philosophical Commentary. Cambridge University Press.
Gyula Klima (2009). John Buridan. Oxford University Press.
Paloma Pérez-Ilzarbe (2004). Complexio, Enunciatio, Assensus: The Role of Propositions in Knowledge According to John Buridan. In A. Maierù & L. Valente (eds.), Medieval Theories on Assertive and Non-Assertive Language. Leo S. Olschki
Catarina Dutilh Novaes (2005). Buridan's Consequentia: Consequence and Inference Within a Token-Based Semantics. History and Philosophy of Logic 26 (4):277-297.
Joseph Hill (2010). Is Buridan's Theory of Abstraction Incompatible with His Nominalist Semantics? An Evaluation of Klima's Charge Against Buridan. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 84:167-178.
Simon Evnine, ''Every Proposition Asserts Itself to Be True'': A Buridanian Solution to the Liar Paradox?
J. M. M. H. Thijssen (2004). The Buridan School Reassessed. John Buridan and Albert of Saxony. Vivarium 42 (1):18-42.
C. G. Normore (2008). Validity Now and Then. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 38 (S1):19-30.
Jean Buridan (1982). John Buridan on Self-Reference: Chapter Eight of Buridan's Sophismata. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #179,414 of 1,700,312 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #88,892 of 1,700,312 )
How can I increase my downloads?