David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 18 (2):109-132 (1987)
introduced the concept of effective demand in the nascent science of economics; his discussions of astronomy were acute enough to raise Duhem’s interest. Neither are Buridan’s credentials as a nominalist in doubt, although investigation into his precise relation to William of Ockham continues: he rejected all abstract entities, whether universals, common natures, the complexe significabile, or types above and beyond tokens; for Buridan, every thing which exists is a concrete individual. His anti-realism included an epistemological component as well, for Buridan maintained that the source of all knowledge is experience.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
T. Kermit Scott (1971). Nicholas of Autrecourt, Buridan and Ockhamism. Journal of the History of Philosophy 9 (1):15-41.
Eileen Serene (1982). Demonstrative Science. In Norman Kretzmann, Anthony Kenny & Jan Pinborg (eds.), Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge. 496--517.
Paul Vincent Spade (1982). The Semantics of Terms. In Norman Kretzmann, Anthony Kenny & Jan Pinborg (eds.), Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge.
John Trentman (1970). Ockham on Mental. Mind 79 (316):586-590.
Citations of this work BETA
Robert Pasnau (2010). Medieval Social Epistemology:Scientia for Mere Mortals. Episteme 7 (1):23-41.
Similar books and articles
Michael J. Fitzgerald (2006). Problems with Temporality and Scientific Propositions in John Buridan and Albert of Saxony. Vivarium 44 (s 2-3):305-337.
C. G. Normore (2008). Validity Now and Then. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 38 (S1):19-30.
J. M. M. H. Thijssen (2004). The Buridan School Reassessed. John Buridan and Albert of Saxony. Vivarium 42 (1):18-42.
Simon Evnine, ''Every Proposition Asserts Itself to Be True'': A Buridanian Solution to the Liar Paradox?
Joseph Hill (2010). Is Buridan's Theory of Abstraction Incompatible with His Nominalist Semantics? An Evaluation of Klima's Charge Against Buridan. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 84:167-178.
Catarina Dutilh Novaes (2005). Buridan's Consequentia: Consequence and Inference Within a Token-Based Semantics. History and Philosophy of Logic 26 (4):277-297.
Paloma Pérez-Ilzarbe (2004). Complexio, Enunciatio, Assensus: The Role of Propositions in Knowledge According to John Buridan. In A. Maierù & L. Valente (eds.), Medieval Theories on Assertive and Non-Assertive Language. Leo S. Olschki.
Gyula Klima (2009). John Buridan. Oxford University Press.
Jean Buridan (1982). John Buridan on Self-Reference: Chapter Eight of Buridan's Sophismata. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #214,234 of 1,102,061 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #128,850 of 1,102,061 )
How can I increase my downloads?