Lying

Philosophy in the Contemporary World 15 (1):125-132 (2008)
Abstract The following essay involves a discussion of four theories about lying and their application to a specific circumstance, the Nazi-Jew situation, as found in Kant, Aquinas, Pruss, and Guervin. By examining their thoughts on this particular situation, we may draw out, by the use of “right reason,” ways to handle everyday situations that causes us to face the tragic choice between two goods that lying presents. The argument is that, if approached in a certain way, the tragic choice lying presents may be avoided
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified (fix it)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,875
External links
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    Alexander R. Pruss (2010). Lies and Dishonest Endorsements. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 84:213-222.
    Christopher Tollefsen (2012). Augustine, Aquinas, and the Absolute Norm Against Lying. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 86 (1):111-134.
    Roy Sorensen (2012). Lying with Conditionals. Philosophical Quarterly 62 (249):820-832.
    Alan Strudler (2010). The Distinctive Wrong in Lying. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (2).

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-01-09

    Total downloads

    4 ( #180,404 of 556,837 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #64,847 of 556,837 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums