Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 6 (2) (2012)
|Abstract||In the contemporary moral responsibility debate, most theorists seem to be giving accounts of responsibility in the ‘desert-entailing sense’. Despite this agreement, little has been said about the notion of desert that is supposedly entailed. In this paper I propose an understanding of desert sufficient to help explain why the blameworthy and praiseworthy deserve blame and praise, respectively. I do so by drawing upon what might seem an unusual resource. I appeal to so-called Fitting-Attitude accounts of value to help inform a conception of desert or merit, one that can be usefully applied to discussions of moral responsibility. I argue that the view, which I call, Desert as Fittingness (DAF), merits additional attention. I do so by making two claims: First, that it does better than extant Fitting Attitude accounts of blameworthiness and praiseworthiness; second, that it has an initial plausibility with respect to informing a general account of desert. While these reasons are insufficient to show the view is true, they do make the case for taking the view seriously.|
|Keywords||desert moral responsibility|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Carl Knight (2011). Responsibility, Desert, and Justice. In Carl Knight & Zofia Stemplowska (eds.), Responsibility and Distributive Justice. Oxford University Press.
Howard Simmons (2010). Moral Desert: A Critique. University Press of America.
Shelly Kagan (2012). The Geometry of Desert. Oxford University Press.
Tamler Sommers (forthcoming). Partial Desert. In David Shoemaker (ed.), Oxford Studies in Agency and Responsibility. Oxford University Press.
Serena Olsaretti (ed.) (2003). Desert and Justice. Oxford University Press.
S. Smilansky (1996). Discussion. The Connection Between Responsibility and Desert: The Crucial Distinction. Mind 105 (419):485-486.
Saul Smilansky (1996). The Connection Between Responsibility and Desert: The Crucial Distinction. Mind 105 (419):485-486.
Stephen Kershnar (2005). Giving Capitalists Their Due. Economics and Philosophy 21 (1):65-87.
Benjamin Vilhauer (2009). Free Will Skepticism and Personhood as a Desert Base. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 39 (3):pp. 489-511.
Kristján Kristjánsson (2005). A Utilitarian Justification of Desert in Distributive Justice. Journal of Moral Philosophy 2 (2):147-170.
Louis P. Pojman & Owen McLeod (eds.) (1999). What Do We Deserve?: A Reader on Justice and Desert. Oxford University Press.
Brian Rosebury (1995). Moral Responsibility and "Moral Luck&Quot;. Philosophical Review 104 (4):499-524.
Seth Shabo (2012). Compatibilism and Moral Claimancy: An Intermediate Path to Appropriate Blame. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84 (1):158-186.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads55 ( #21,913 of 722,783 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #17,046 of 722,783 )
How can I increase my downloads?