David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Perspectives on Science 18 (3):284-310 (2010)
Both Kuhn and Cavell acknowledge their indebtedness to each other in their respective books of the 60s. Cavell in (Must We Mean What We Say (1969)) and Kuhn in (The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 1962). They were together at Berkeley where they had both moved in 1956 as assistant professors after their first encounter at the Society of Fellows at Harvard (Kuhn 2000d, p. 197). In Berkeley, Cavell and Kuhn discovered a mutual understanding and an intellectual affinity. They had regular conversations which Cavell describes as "extremely important" (Conant 1989, p. 40; cf. Cavell 1979, p. xix). Cavell says that he felt he wanted to assure Kuhn that "philosophy did not have standing answers to the questions [Kuhn] ..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Vasso Kindi (2005). The Relation of History of Science to Philosophy of Science in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions and Kuhn's Later Philosophical Work. Perspectives on Science 13 (4):495-530.
Diarmuid Costello (2008). On the Very Idea of a 'Specific'medium: Michael Fried and Stanley Cavell on Painting and Photography as Arts. Critical Inquiry 34 (2):274-312.
Ronald Dworkin (1982). Law as Interpretation. Critical Inquiry 9 (1):179.
Caroline A. Jones (2000). The Modernist Paradigm: The Artworld and Thomas Kuhn. Critical Inquiry 26 (3):488.
Michael Fried (1982). How Modernism Works: A Response to T. J. Clark. Critical Inquiry 9 (1):217.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
George A. Reisch (1991). Did Kuhn Kill Logical Empiricism? Philosophy of Science 58 (2):264-277.
Vasso P. Kindi (1995). Kuhn'sthe Structure of Scientific Revolutions Revisited. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 26 (1):75 - 92.
David Gorman (1995). Book Review: The American Philosopher: Conversations with Quine, Davidson, Putnam, Nozick, Danto, Rorty, Cavell, MacIntyre, and Kuhn. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Literature 19 (2):388-389.
Paul Hoyningen-Huene (2002). Paul Feyerabend Und Thomas Kuhn. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 33 (1):61-83.
Richard Henry Schmitt (2006). Darwin, Kuhn, and Polanyi. Tradition and Discovery 33 (2):49-55.
Vasso Kindi (2005). The Relation of History of Science to Philosophy of Science In. Perspectives on Science 13 (4).
K. Brad Wray (2011). Kuhn's Evolutionary Social Epistemology. Cambridge University Press.
Timothy Gould (2007). Present Tense: Working with Cavell. Reading Cavell Edited by Crary, Alice, and Sanford Shieh. Contending with Stanley Cavell Edited by Goodman, Russell B.. Cavell on Film Edited by Rothman, William. [REVIEW] Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 65 (2):229–233.
Paul Hoyningen-Huene (2008). Thomas Kuhn and the Chemical Revolution. Foundations of Chemistry 10 (2):101-115.
Added to index2010-06-30
Total downloads148 ( #14,764 of 1,725,958 )
Recent downloads (6 months)110 ( #7,364 of 1,725,958 )
How can I increase my downloads?