On fineness of grain

Philosophical Studies 163 (3):763-781 (2013)
Abstract
A central job for propositions is to be the objects of the attitudes. Propositions are the things we doubt, believe and suppose. Some philosophers have thought that propositions are sets of possible worlds. But many have become convinced that such an account individuates propositions too coarsely. This raises the question of how finely propositions should be individuated. An account of how finely propositions should be individuated on which they are individuated very finely is sketched. Objections to the effect that the account individuates propositions too finely are raised and responses to the objections are provided. It is also shown that theories that try to individuate propositions less finely have serious problems
Keywords Propositions  Propositional attitudes  Possible worlds  Structured propositions
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,817
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Jeffrey King (1996). Structured Propositions and Sentence Structure. Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (5):495 - 521.
Jeffrey C. King (2009). Questions of Unity. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 109 (1pt3):257 - 277.

View all 12 references

Citations of this work BETA
John Collins (2014). Cutting It (Too) Fine. Philosophical Studies 169 (2):143-172.
Similar books and articles
William J. Rapaport (1976). On Cogito Propositions. Philosophical Studies 29 (1):63-68.
Thomas Hodgson (2012). Propositions, Structure and Representation. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 112 (3):339-349.
Peter Mittelstaedt (1978). The Metalogic of Quantum Logic. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:249 - 256.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-12-20

Total downloads

109 ( #10,463 of 1,099,909 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

7 ( #40,663 of 1,099,909 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.