David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1 (1):1-27 (1998)
The paradigm case of power as ?power over? (not ?power to') betrays a concern (1) more with the capacity to dominate others than with the unqualified capacity to act as such; (2) more with the fact, than with the morality, of dominance ? underscoring the key analytical distinction between ?power? and ?authority'; and (3) more with compulsion than co?operation. The three moves to combine (1) ?power over? with ?power to?, (2) ?power? with ?authority?, and (3) ?power? with ?co?operation?, are all seen as inflationary, diminishing the value of the paradigm case, and assisting in rendering power, in its actual operations, both more obscure and insidious. Tumbling down this slope, there is a further argument, to the same effect, but secured by deflating, rather than inflating, the paradigm case. This deflationary argument (4) views luck as an alternative to power. In a world of dizzying technological innovation, marked by a deepening gap between rich and poor in the cities, between advanced and dependent states, we confront an inclination in many quarters both to expand and to contract power, so that it is everything and everywhere, thus nothing and nowhere. In attempts to substitute luck for power, it becomes difficult to assign to power responsibility, as heretofore. This paper is the first of two parts, taking a critical look at the overwhelming of power by inflation. The second part of this paper will be published in a subsequent issue, and it critically inspects the argument for deflation
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Pamela Pansardi (2012). A Non-Normative Theory of Power and Domination. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (5):1-20.
Similar books and articles
Preston King (1999). Liberty as Power. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 2 (3):1-25.
Thomas Pink (2009). Power and Moral Responsibility. Philosophical Explorations 12 (2):127 – 149.
Preston King (1998). Democracy and the Persistence of Power. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1 (4):93-112.
Krzysztof Ziarek (2004). A Global Tradition? Power and Historicity. Research in Phenomenology 34 (1):103-120.
Judith Butler (1997). The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection. Stanford University Press.
Peter Morriss (2002). Power: A Philosophical Analysis. Manchester University Press.
Brian Barry (2002). Capitalists Rule Ok? Some Puzzles About Power. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 1 (2):155-184.
Amy Allen (1998). Rethinking Power. Hypatia 13 (1):21 - 40.
David Nyberg (1981). Power Over Power: What Power Means in Ordinary Life, How It is Related to Acting Freely, and What It Can Contribute to a Renovated Ethics of Education. Cornell University Press.
Johan Galtung (1964). Balance of Power and the Problem of Perception. Inquiry 7 (1-4):277 – 294.
Janet Farrell Smith (1986). Possessive Power. Hypatia 1 (2):103 - 120.
Mark Haugaard (1997). The Consensual Basis of Conflictual Power: A Critical Response to "Using Power, Fighting Power" by Jane Mansbridge. Constellations 3 (3):401-406.
William J. Courtenay (1990). Capacity and Volition: A History of the Distinction of Absolute and Ordained Power. P. Lubrina.
Brian R. Lashley (1998). A Defense of Statistical Power Analysis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):209-210.
Added to index2011-10-19
Total downloads2 ( #501,593 of 1,696,585 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #345,974 of 1,696,585 )
How can I increase my downloads?