David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cambridge University Press (1996)
This book defends the prospects for a science of society. It argues that behind the diverse methods of the natural sciences lies a common core of scientific rationality that the social sciences can and sometimes do achieve. It also argues that good social science must be in part about large-scale social structures and processes and thus that methodological individualism is misguided. These theses are supported by a detailed discussion of actual social research, including theories of agrarian revolution, organizational ecology, social theories of depression, and supply-demand explanations in economics. Professor Kincaid provides a general picture of explanation and confirmation in the social sciences and discusses the nature of scientific rationality, functional explanation, optimality arguments, meaning and interpretation, the place of microfoundations in social explanation, the status of neo-classical economics, the role of idealizations and non-experimental evidence, and other specific controversies.
|Keywords||Social sciences Research Social sciences Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$6.50 used (90% off) $35.98 new (35% off) $59.99 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||H62.K515 1996|
|ISBN(s)||0521558913 0521482682 9780521558914|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Christopher Clarke (forthcoming). The Explanatory Virtue of Abstracting Away From Idiosyncratic and Messy Detail. Philosophical Studies:1-21.
Julian Reiss (2012). The Explanation Paradox. Journal of Economic Methodology 19 (1):43-62.
Thomas Boyer-Kassem & Cyrille Imbert (2015). Scientific Collaboration: Do Two Heads Need to Be More Than Twice Better Than One? Philosophy of Science 82 (4):667-688.
Caterina Marchionni (2013). Playing with Networks: How Economists Explain. [REVIEW] European Journal for Philosophy of Science 3 (3):331-352.
Robert Kowalenko (2014). Ceteris Paribus Laws: A Naturalistic Account. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 28 (2):133-155.
Similar books and articles
Harold Kincaid (2000). Formal Rationality and its Pernicious Effects on the Social Sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 30 (1):67-88.
James W. van Evra (1969). II. Understanding in the Social Sciences Revisited. Inquiry 12 (1-4):347-349.
Ramkrishna Mukherjee & Partha N. Mukherji (eds.) (2000). Methodology in Social Research: Dilemmas and Perspectives: Essays in Honor of Ramkrishna Mukherjee. Sage Publications, Inc..
C. Mantzavinos (ed.) (2009). Philosophy of the Social Sciences: Philosophical Theory and Scientific Practice. Cambridge University Press.
Brian Fay (2006). For Science in the Social Sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (2):227-240.
Aviezer Tucker (1999). Philosophical Foundations of the Social Sciences: Analyzing Controversies in Social Research Harold Kincaid Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, Xvi + 283 Pp., £12.95. [REVIEW] Dialogue 38 (02):435-.
Zuyi Du (2000). The Scientific Merit of the Social Sciences: Implications for Research and Application. Trentham Books.
Harold Kincaid (1990). Defending Laws in the Social Sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 20 (1):56?83.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads40 ( #98,534 of 1,790,069 )
Recent downloads (6 months)13 ( #63,762 of 1,790,069 )
How can I increase my downloads?