Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (2):176-182 (1999)
|Abstract||Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PID) is often seen as an improvement upon prenatal testing. I argue that PID may exacerbate the eugenic features of prenatal testing and make possible an expanded form of free-market eugenics. The current practice of prenatal testing is eugenic in that its aim is to reduce the numbers of people with genetic disorders. Due to social pressures and eugenic attitudes held by clinical geneticists in most countries, it results in eugenic outcomes even though no state coercion is involved. I argue that technological advances may soon make PID widely accessible. Because abortion is not involved, and multiple embryos are available, PID is radically more effective as a tool of genetic selection. It will also make possible selection on the basis of non-pathological characteristics, leading, potentially, to a full-blown free-market eugenics. For these reasons, I argue that PID should be strictly regulated|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Thomas S. Petersen (2005). Just Diagnosis? Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Injustices to Disabled People. Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (4):231-234.
Janet Malek & Judith Daar (2012). The Case for a Parental Duty to Use Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis for Medical Benefit. American Journal of Bioethics 12 (4):3-11.
Tanja Krones & Gerd Richter (2004). Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD): European Perspectives and the German Situation. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (5):623 – 640.
C. Cameron (2003). Is There an Ethical Difference Between Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Abortion? Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (2):90-92.
E. Asscher & B.-J. Koops (2009). The Right Not to Know and Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis for Huntington's Disease. Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (1):30-33.
C. Farrelly (2009). Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis, Reproductive Freedom, and Deliberative Democracy. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (2):135-154.
Mark Popovsky (2007). Jewish Perspectives on the Use of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (4):699-711.
M. Spriggs (2004). Commodification of Children Again and Non-Disclosure Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis for Huntington's Disease. Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (6):538-538.
H. Draper & R. Chadwick (1999). Beware! Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis May Solve Some Old Problems but It Also Raises New Ones. Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (2):114-120.
P. Boddington & M. Parker (2008). Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis for Familial Hypercholesterolaemia: A Commentary on the Recent HFEA Decision. Clinical Ethics 3 (3):145-148.
Jeffrey R. Botkin (1998). Ethical Issues and Practical Problems in Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 26 (1):17-28.
Richard J. Tasca & Michael E. McClure (1998). The Emerging Technology and Application of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 26 (1):7-16.
Patrick Giam (2012). Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: A Perspective From Human Dignity`. Bioethics Research Notes 24 (3):40.
John Mcmillan (2008). Choosing Between Possible Lives: Law and Ethics of Prenatal and Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis - by R. Scott. Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (4):355-357.
Silvia Camporesi (2009). Choosing Deafness with Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: An Ethical Way to Carry on a Cultural Bloodline? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (01):86-.
Added to index2010-09-13
Total downloads5 ( #170,343 of 739,079 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 739,079 )
How can I increase my downloads?