Think 3 (2003)
|Abstract||possible, your investigation is unlikely ever to get off the ground), there’s no such excuse for philosophers. The philosopher should be unrestricted by fashions in thought, including the unquestioning acceptance of whatever scientific theories are currently dominant. The fact is, however, that in this field and in the philosophy of mind, many|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
John W. Godbey Jr (1975). Central-State Materialism and Parapsychology. Analysis 36 (October):22-25.
William James (1920/1969). Collected Essays and Reviews. New York, Russell & Russell.
Shivesh Chandra Thakur (ed.) (1976). Philosophy and Psychical Research. Humanities Press.
H. H. Price (1995). Philosophical Interactions with Parapsychology: The Major Writings of H.H. Price on Parapsychology and Survival. St. Martin's Press.
Stephen Palmquist, Kant’s Criticism of Swedenborg: Parapsychology and the Origin of the Copernican Hypothesis.
Antony Flew (ed.) (1987). Readings in the Philosophical Problems of Parapsychology. Prometheus Books.
Mitchell G. Ash, Horst Gundlach & Thomas Sturm (2010). Irreducible Mind? On E. Kelly Et Al., Irreducible Mind: Toward a Psychology for the 21st Century. [REVIEW] American Journal of Psychology 123:246-250.
K. Ramakrishna Rao (ed.) (2010). Yoga and Parapsychology: Empirical Research and Theoretical Essays. Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.
John Beloff (1987). Parapsychology and the Mind-Body Problem. Inquiry 30 (September):215-25.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads56 ( #21,303 of 722,765 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #17,033 of 722,765 )
How can I increase my downloads?