David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Children therefore, whether they be brought up and preserved by the father, or by the mother, or by whomsoever, are in most absolute subjection to him or her, that so bringeth them up, or preserveth them. And they may alienate them, that is, assign his or her dominion, by selling, or giving them, in adoption or servitude to others; or may pawn them for hostages, kill them for rebellion, or sacriﬁce them for peace, by the law of nature, when he or she, in his or her conscience, think it to be necessary. —The Elements of Law 23.8..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
R. S. Howe (2013). Infant Circumcision: The Last Stand for the Dead Dogma of Parental (Sovereignal) Rights. Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (7):475-481.
Similar books and articles
Michael Cuffaro (2011). On Thomas Hobbes's Fallible Natural Law Theory. History of Philosophy Quarterly 28 (2):175-190.
Stephen David Ross (2009). For Giving. International Studies in Philosophy Monograph Series:469-504.
Ted H. Miller (2011). Mortal Gods: Science, Politics, and the Humanist Ambitions of Thomas Hobbes. Pennsylvania State University Press.
Thomas Hobbes (1994/1999). The Elements of Law, Natural and Politic: Part I, Human Nature, Part Ii, De Corpore Politico ; with Three Lives. Oxford University Press.
Timothy Fuller (1990). Compatibilities on the Idea of Law in Thomas Aquinas and Thomas Hobbes. Hobbes Studies 3 (1):112-134.
Lloyd (2010). The Moral Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes: A Reply to Critics. Hobbes Studies 23 (2):180-187.
Henrik Syse (2007). Natural Law, Religion, and Rights: An Exploration of the Relationship Between Natural Law and Natural Rights, with Special Emphasis on the Teachings of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. St. Augustine's Press.
Perez Zagorin (2009). Hobbes and the Law of Nature. Princeton University Press.
Veit-Justus Rollmann (2008). Rechtskraft als Friedensbedingung –Thomas Hobbes rechtsphilosophischer Ansatz in seiner Schrift Vom Bürger. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 40:195-203.
Helen Thornton (2005). State of Nature or Eden?: Thomas Hobbes and His Contemporaries on the Natural Condition of Human Beings. University of Rochester Press.
Jeremie Hughes (1988). Will My Rabbit Go to Heaven?: And Other Questions Children Ask. Lion Pub. Corp..
Martin Loughlin (2012). The Political Jurisprudence of Thomas Hobbes. In David Dyzenhaus & Thomas Poole (eds.), Hobbes and the Law. Cambridge University Press
Jeremy Anderson (2012). Hobbess Demanding Consequentialism: Comments on Bernard Gerts Hobbes: Prince of Peace. Hobbes Studies 25 (2):188-198.
Norberto Bobbio (1993). Thomas Hobbes and the Natural Law Tradition. University of Chicago Press.
Added to index2010-12-08
Total downloads22 ( #170,633 of 1,796,214 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #98,157 of 1,796,214 )
How can I increase my downloads?